S'abonner

Initial Experience with a Virtual Platform for Advanced Gastrointestinal Minimally Invasive Surgery Fellowship Interviews - 23/11/20

Doi : 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.08.768 
Arnab Majumder, MD, Shaina R. Eckhouse, MD, FACS, L Michael Brunt, MD, FACS, Michael M. Awad, MD, PhD, FACS, Francesca M. Dimou, MD, MS, J Christopher Eagon, MD, FACS, Sara Holden, MD, FACS, Heather Fone, BA, Jeffrey A. Blatnik, MD, FACS
 Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 

Correspondence address: Jeffrey A Blatnik, MD, FACS, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, Box 8109, St Louis, MO 63105.Department of SurgeryWashington University School of Medicine660 S Euclid Ave, Box 8109St LouisMO63105

Abstract

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic travel restrictions triggered a rapid alteration in the interview process for fellowships this spring. We describe our initial experience with virtual interviews for Advanced Gastrointestinal (GI) Minimally Invasive Surgery Fellowships and assess the value and limitations via a post-interview applicant survey.

Study Design

Twenty candidates were interviewed via Zoom teleconferencing during March and April 2020 using combined group and breakout rooms. An anonymous post-interview Likert and free text survey was sent to candidates with questions regarding feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability of this method.

Results

Seventeen of 20 candidates (85%) responded to the survey. The candidates rated ease of interaction with the program director, faculty surgeons, and the current fellow highly: 94%, 83%, and 89%, respectively. The majority (53%) stated the virtual interviews exceeded or met expectations. Only a minority, 12%, reported the virtual platform was short of expectations. Approximately 70% noted little to no impact of not being able to conduct these interviews in-person and not being able to physically see the program institution. Overall, 94% were satisfied with their experience, and only 6% were neutral, with no respondents reporting dissatisfaction. Finally, 76% would recommend a virtual interview in the future. Most negative open response comments were secondary to issues with software rather than the lack of the in-person traditional interviews.

Conclusions

The use of a remote teleconferencing platform provides a favorable method for conducting fellowship interviews and results in a high degree of candidate satisfaction. Virtual interviews will likely be increasingly substituted for in-person interviews across the spectrum of medical training.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Visual Abstract




Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Disclosure Information: Nothing to disclose.
 Disclosures outside the scope of this work: Dr Eckhouse received payment for consultancy from Gore. Dr Awad's institution received educational grants from Ethicon, Applied, Intuitive, and Bard Davol. Dr Blatnik is a paid consultant to Bard Davol and Intuitive Surgical. Dr Blatnik's institution receives grant money from Ethicon and Cook Medical.
 Support: Dr Eckhouse’ institution received grant payment from the Barnes Jewish Hospital Foundation.


© 2020  American College of Surgeons. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 231 - N° 6

P. 670-678 - décembre 2020 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Preventive Effect of High-Dose Digestive Enzyme Management on Development of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease after Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
  • Koya Yasukawa, Akira Shimizu, Takahide Yokoyama, Koji Kubota, Tsuyoshi Notake, Hitoshi Seki, Akira Kobayashi, Yuji Soejima
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Virtual Interviews for Fellowship and Residency Applications Are Effective Replacements for In-Person Interviews and Should Continue Post-COVID
  • Andrew S. Wright

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.