Historical Considerations and Surgical Quality Improvement in Robotic Prostatectomy - 18/11/20
Doi : 10.1016/j.ucl.2020.09.015
Danly O. Omil-Lima, MD a, ⁎ 
, Karishma Gupta, MD b, Adam C. Calaway, MD b, Michael A. Zell, MD b
, Karishma Gupta, MD b, Adam C. Calaway, MD b, Michael A. Zell, MD b a Urology Institute, University Hospitals–Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
b Urology Institute–University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
∗Corresponding author.
Résumé |
Laparoscopic prostatectomy was technically challenging and not widely adopted. Robotics led to the widespread adoption of minimally invasive prostatectomy, which has been used heavily, supplanting the open and traditional laparoscopic approach. The benefits of robotic prostatectomy are disputed. Data suggest that robotic prostatectomy outcomes have improved over time.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Minimally invasive surgery, Prostate cancer, Robotic prostatectomy, Surgical quality improvement
Plan
© 2020
Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Vol 48 - N° 1
P. 35-44 - février 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Recent Advances and Current Role of Transperineal Prostate Biopsy
- Yasin Bhanji, Mathew J. Allaway, Michael A. Gorin
- Robotic Radical Cystectomy in the Contemporary Management of Bladder Cancer
- Peter Y. Cai, Aleem I. Khan, Jonathan E. Shoag, Douglas S. Scherr
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?