S'abonner

Clinical Utility of Stress Echocardiography in Remote Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Populations: A 10-Year Study in Central Australia - 17/11/20

Doi : 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.04.013 
Seshika Ratwatte, BMed a, Benedict Costello, MBBS, PhD b, Nadarajah Kangaharan, MBBS c, Katrina Bolton, MBBS c, Amrina Kaur, MBBS c, Wendy Corkill, BN c, Bernhard Kuepper, MD c, Bradley Pitman, BSc, DMU d, Prashanthan Sanders, MBBS, PhD d, Christopher X. Wong, MBBS, MSc, MPH, PhD d,
a University of Newcastle, Concord Repatriation and General Hospital, and Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia 
b Baker IDI Heart & Diabetes Institute and Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Vic, Australia 
c Department of Cardiology, Alice Springs Hospital, Alice Springs, NT, Australia 
d University of Adelaide, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia 

Corresponding author at: Department of Cardiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Port Road, Adelaide, Australia, 5000. Tel.: +61 8 8313 9000; Fax: +61 8 8362 2273Department of CardiologyRoyal Adelaide HospitalPort RoadAdelaide5000Australia

Abstract

Background

Remote Central Australia has a large Indigenous population and a significant burden of cardiovascular disease. Stress echocardiography has been previously validated as a useful investigation for long-term prognostication. However, there are no prior studies assessing its utility in remote or Indigenous populations.

Method

Consecutive individuals undergoing stress echocardiography in Central Australia between 2007 and 2017 were included. Stress echocardiography was performed and reported via standard protocols. Individuals were followed up for all-cause mortality.

Results

One-thousand and eight patients (1,008) (54% Indigenous Australian) were included. After a mean follow-up of 3.5±2.4 years, 54 (5%) patients were deceased. Overall, 797 (79%) patients had no abnormalities during rest or stress echocardiography, with no difference according to ethnicity (p>0.05). In patients with a normal test, annual mortality averaged 1.3% over 5 years of follow-up, with annual mortality significantly higher in Indigenous compared to non-Indigenous individuals (1.8% vs 0.6% respectively). In those with an abnormal test, annual mortality was 4.4% vs 1.3% in Indigenous and non-Indigenous individuals respectively. Increasing age, Indigenous ethnicity and cardiometabolic comorbidities were associated with mortality in univariate analyses (p<0.05 for all). In multivariate models, only chronic kidney disease remained predictive of mortality, with other associations (including Indigenous ethnicity) becoming attenuated.

Conclusion

This is the first study to report on the use of stress echocardiography in a remote or Indigenous population. A normal stress echocardiogram in remote Indigenous individuals was able to identify a lower risk group of patients in this setting. Although Indigenous individuals with a normal test still had a higher annual rate of mortality compared to non-Indigenous individuals, this association appeared to be mediated by cardiometabolic comorbidities.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Stress testing, Stress echocardiography, Population health, Indigenous, Cardiovascular disease, Indigenous health, Remote health


Plan


Crown Copyright © 2020  Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 29 - N° 12

P. 1808-1814 - décembre 2020 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Contemporary Outcomes of Pulmonary Valve Endocarditis: A 16-Year Single Centre Experience
  • Nicolas Isaza, Nabin K. Shrestha, Steven Gordon, Gosta B. Pettersson, Shinya Unai, Maria Vega Brizneda, James C. Witten, Brian P. Griffin, Bo Xu
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Determinants of Diastolic Dysfunction Following Myocardial Infarction: Evidence for Causation Beyond Infarct Size
  • Sandhir B. Prasad, Andrew Lin, Christopher Kwan, Joanne Sippel, John F. Younger, Christopher Hammett, Liza Thomas, John J. Atherton

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.