Timing of randomization after an acute coronary syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus - 11/11/20
Abstract |
Background |
The timing of enrolment following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) may influence cardiovascular (CV) outcomes and potentially treatment effect in clinical trials. Understanding the timing and type of clinical events after an ACS will allow for clinicians to better tailor evidence-based treatments to optimize therapeutic effect. Using a large contemporary trial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) post-ACS, we examined the impact of timing of enrolment on subsequent CV outcomes.
Methods |
EXAMINE was a randomized trial of alogliptin versus placebo in 5,380 patients with T2DM and a recent ACS from October 2009 to March 2013. The primary outcome was a composite of CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or nonfatal stroke. The median follow-up was 18 months. In this post hoc analysis, we examined the occurrence of subsequent CV events by timing of enrollment divided by tertiles of time from ACS to randomization: 8-34, 35-56, and 57-141 days.
Results |
Patients randomized early (compared to the latest times) had less comorbidities at baseline including a history of heart failure (HF; 24.7% vs 33.0%), prior coronary artery bypass graft (9.6% vs 15.9%), or atrial fibrillation (5.9% vs 9.4%). Despite the reduced comorbidity burden, the risk of the primary outcome was highest in patients randomized early compared to the latest time (adjusted hazard ratio 1.47; 95% CI 1.21-1.74). Similarly, patients randomized early had an increased risk of recurrent MI (adjusted hazard ratio 1.51; 95% CI 1.17-1.96) and HF hospitalization (1.49; 95% CI 1.05-2.10).
Conclusions |
In a contemporary cohort of T2DM with a recent ACS, the risk for recurrent CV events including MI and HF hospitalization is elevated early after an ACS. Given the emergence of antihyperglycemic therapies that reduce the risk of MI and HF among patients with T2DM at high CV risk, future studies evaluating the initiation of these therapies in the early period following an ACS are warranted given the large burden of potentially modifiable CV events.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
☆ | Disclosure: Dr Sharma has received support from the FRSQ-Junior 1 clinician scientist award, the Alberta Innovates Health Solution Clinician Scientist fellowship, and the European Society of Cardiology Young Investigator research grant and has received research support from Roche Diagnostics and the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Bayer Vascular award. Dr White, Dr Zannad, and Dr Bakris have received personal fees from Takeda Development Center. Dr Bakris has also received personal fees from AbbVie, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Novarits. Dr Rossignol received personal fees (consulting) from Novartis, Relypsa, AstraZeneca, Stealth Peptides, Fresenius, Vifor Fresenius Medical Care Renal Pharma, and Clinical Trials Mobile Application; has received lecture fees from CVRx; and is a cofounder of CardioRenal. Dr Zannad has received personal fees for Steering Committee membership from Janssen, Bayer, Pfizer, Novartis, Boston Scientific, Resmed, General Electric, and Boehringer Ingelheim; has received consultancy fees for Amgen, CVRx, Quantum Genomics, Relypsa, ZS Pharma, AstraZeneca, and GSK; is a founder of Cardiovascular Clinical Trialists. Dr Ferreira serves as Steering Committee member for trials sponsored by Boehringer-Ingelheim. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose. |
Vol 229
P. 40-51 - novembre 2020 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?