Ultrasonic osteotome versus high-speed burr in cervical anterior vertebral subtotal resection: A retrospective study of 81 cases - 23/10/20
pages | 4 |
Iconographies | 1 |
Vidéos | 0 |
Autres | 0 |
Abstract |
Aim |
This study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of ultrasonic osteotome in cervical anterior vertebral subtotal resection.
Methods |
Retrospective clinical data were collated for 81 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy who required cervical anterior vertebral subtotal resection.
Results |
Group A (n=40) was treated with an ultrasonic osteotome and group B (n=41) with a high-speed burr. Vertebrectomy time, intraoperative blood loss, surgical complications, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores and JOA score improvement were compared. Group A showed significantly shorter vertebrectomy time and significantly less intraoperative blood loss (P<0.05). In group A, dysphagia occurred in one patient, and superior laryngeal nerve injury in one. Urinary tract infection occurred in one patient in group B. JOA score in both groups significantly increased 3 days after surgery (P<0.05), and at last follow-up compared with 3 days after surgery (P<0.05).
Conclusion |
Ultrasonic osteotome was a safe and effective tool for subtotal anterior cervical vertebral resection.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Ultrasonic osteotome, Subtotal anterior cervical vertebral resection, Cervical spondylotic myelopathy, Intraoperative blood loss, Surgical complications
Plan
Vol 66 - N° 5
P. 369-372 - novembre 2020 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’achat d’article à l’unité est indisponible à l’heure actuelle.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?