S'abonner

Perceived Discriminatory Factors that Impact Prenatal Care Satisfaction and Attendance Among Adolescent and Young Adult Couples - 24/09/20

Doi : 10.1016/j.jpag.2020.06.014 
Brianna Dillon, BS 1, , Tashuna Albritton, PhD, MSW 1, Rose Saint Fleur-Calixte, PhD 1, Lisa Rosenthal, PhD 2, Trace Kershaw, PhD 3
1 Department of Community Health and Social Medicine, City University of New York School of Medicine, New York, NY 
2 Psychology Department, Pace University, New York, NY 
3 Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT 

Address correspondence to: Brianna Dillon, BS, City University of New York School of Medicine (M3 Medical Student), City University of New York School of Medicine, New York, NY 10031City University of New York School of Medicine (M3 Medical Student)City University of New York School of MedicineNew YorkNY 10031

Abstract

Objective

To identify possible discriminatory factors that lead to prenatal care dissatisfaction and disengagement from prenatal care among young, expecting couples with a focus on exploring the experiences of Black and Latinx participants.

Methods

A total of 296 young adolescent couples were recruited. Each couple consisted of an expecting female (ExpF) and an expecting male (ExpM). Participants were asked to give responses to a survey, and data was collected at 3 different time points.

Participants

The sample consisted of 296 expecting young couples.

Setting

Participants were recruited from obstetrics and gynecology clinics and ultrasound clinics from 4 university-affiliated hospitals in southern Connecticut.

Outcome Measures

The main outcome measure was prenatal care satisfaction. The secondary outcome was number of prenatal care visits that were attended by each member of the couple dyad. Both of these outcomes were assessed to evaluate whether discriminatory factors that participants experienced in healthcare had an effect on each outcome.

Results

A total of 51 males (17.5%) and 36 females (12.4%) reported a perception of experiencing discrimination in the healthcare system a few times a year or more. Those who believed that race contributed to discrimination in the healthcare system were 2.45 times more likely to have an unpleasant prenatal visit (P = .018). Those who believed that age contributed to discrimination in the healthcare system were 2.74 times more likely to have an unpleasant prenatal visit (P = .001). Participants who believed that physical appearance contributed to discrimination in the healthcare system were 2.83 times more likely to have an unpleasant prenatal visit (P = .01).

Conclusion

Black and Latinx young expecting couples are not exempt from discriminatory experiences during prenatal care. Recommendations for quality improvement in prenatal healthcare settings include implementation of standard evaluative measures specific to personal treatment and supportiveness of the medical team.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key Words : Prenatal care, Race/ethnicity, Maternal and infant health


Plan


 All authors declare that they have nothing to disclose.
 Research was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (1R01MH075685), United States (to TK). Additional support from the Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS (5P30MH062294), United States.


© 2020  North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 33 - N° 5

P. 543-549 - octobre 2020 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Implementation of Pregnancy Checklist into Clinic Workflow: A Quality Improvement Initiative
  • Jacqueline Dallaire, Mallory Hazell, Melissa J. Kottke
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • The Association between Immediate Postpartum Etonogestrel Implants and Positive Postpartum Depression Screens in Adolescents and Young Adults
  • Erin Drake, Kira Grush, Jeanelle Sheeder, Kristina Tocce

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.