Interobserver Agreement in the Assessment of Clinical Findings in Children with Headaches - 20/05/20
Abstract |
Objective |
To determine the interobserver agreement of history and physical examination findings in children undergoing evaluation in the emergency department (ED) for headaches.
Study design |
We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional study of children aged 2-17 years evaluated at 3 tertiary-care pediatric EDs for non-traumatic headaches. Two clinicians independently completed a standardized assessment of each child and documented the presence or absence of history and physical examination variables. Unweighted κ statistics were determined for 68 history and 24 physical examination variables.
Results |
We analyzed 191 paired observations; median age was 12 years, with 19 (9.9%) children younger than 7 years. Interrater reliability was at least moderate (κ ≥ 0.41) for 41 (60.3%) patient history variables. Eleven (61.1%) of 18 physical examination variables for which κ statistics could be calculated had a κ that was at least moderate.
Conclusions |
A substantial number of history and physical examination findings demonstrated at least moderate κ statistic values when assessed in children with headaches in the ED. These variables may be generalizable across different types of clinicians for evaluation of children with headaches. If also found to predict the presence or absence of emergent intracranial abnormalities, the more reliable clinical findings may be helpful in the development of clinical prediction rules or risk stratification models that could be used across settings for children with headaches.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : interrater reliability, pediatric, red flag finding, kappa, emergency medicine, emergency department
Abbreviations : ED, 5KNEE
Plan
Funded by a Clinical and Translational Science Award from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences/National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000040). This publication is supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as part of an award totaling $600,000 with 0% financed with non-governmental sources. The contents are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views of, nor an endorsement, by HRSA, HHS, or the U.S. Government. For more information, please visit HRSA.gov. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. |
Vol 221
P. 207-214 - juin 2020 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?