Measuring atopic eczema symptoms in clinical practice: The first consensus statement from the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema in clinical practice initiative - 14/04/20
on behalf of the
Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative
Abstract |
Background |
Measuring patient-centered outcomes in clinical practice is valuable for monitoring patients and advancing real-world research. A new initiative from the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) group aims to recommend what might be recorded for atopic eczema patients in routine clinical care.
Objectives |
Prioritize outcome domains to measure atopic eczema in clinical practice and select valid and practical outcome measurement instruments for the highest-priority domain.
Methods |
An online survey of HOME members identified and ranked 21 possible health domains. Suitable instruments were then selected for the top-prioritized domain at the HOME VI meeting, using established consensus processes informed by systematic reviews of instrument quality.
Results |
Patient-reported symptoms was the top-prioritized domain. In accordance with psychometric properties and feasibility, there was consensus that the recommended instruments to measure atopic eczema symptoms in clinical practice are the POEM, the PO-SCORAD index, or both. The numeric rating scale for itch received support pending definition and validation in atopic eczema.
Conclusion |
Following the first step of the HOME Clinical Practice initiative, we endorse using the POEM, the PO-SCORAD index, or both for measuring atopic eczema symptoms in clinical practice. Additional high-priority domains for clinical practice will be assessed at subsequent HOME meetings.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : outcomes, outcome measures, instruments, atopic dermatitis, atopic eczema, eczema, Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema, HOME, clinical practice
Abbreviations used : HOME, POEM, PO-SCORAD
Plan
Funding sources: None. |
|
Conflicts of interest: None disclosed. |
|
Reprints not available from the authors. |
Vol 82 - N° 5
P. 1181-1186 - mai 2020 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?