Renal Artery Branch Denervation: Evaluation of Lesion Characteristics Using a Thermochromic Liquid Crystal Phantom Model - 28/02/20
![](/templates/common/images/mail.png)
Résumé |
Background |
Lately, combined main vessel and branch ablation has been recommended during radiofrequency (RF) renal artery denervation. Utilising a validated renal artery phantom model, we aimed (1) to determine thermal injury extent (lesion depth, width and circumferential coverage) and electrode-tissue interface temperature for branch renal artery ablation, and (2) to compare the extent of thermal injury for branch versus main vessel ablation using the same RF System.
Methods |
We employed a gel based renal artery phantom model simulating variable vessel diameter and flow, which incorporated a temperature sensitive thermochromic-liquid-crystal (TLC) film for assessing RF ablation thermodynamics. Ablations in a branch renal artery model (n = 32) were performed using Symplicity Spyral (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Lesion dimensions defined by the 51 °C isotherm, circumferential injury coverage, and electrode-tissue interface temperature were measured for all ablations at 60 seconds.
Results |
Lesion dimensions were 2.13 ± 0.13 mm and 4.13 ± 0.18 mm for depth and width, respectively, involving 23% of the vessel circumference. Maximum electrode-tissue interface temperature was 68.31 ± 2.29 °C. No significant difference in lesion depth between branch and main vessel ablations was found (Δ = 0.02 mm, p = 0.60). However, lesions were wider in the branch (Δ=0.49 mm, p < 0.001) with a larger circumferential coverage compared to main vessel (arc angle of 82.02±3.27° versus 54.90±4.36°, respectively).
Conclusions |
In the phantom model, branch ablations were of similar depth but had larger width and circumferential coverage compared to main vessel ablations. Concerning safety, no overheating at the electrode-tissue interface was observed.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Hypertension, Renal denervation, Radiofrequency ablation
Plan
Vol 29 - N° 3
P. 445-451 - mars 2020 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?