Where you live matters: Regional differences in health care resource use for psoriasis in the United States - 25/02/20
![](/templates/common/images/mail.png)
Abstract |
Background |
It is unknown which U.S. Census region offers the best access to health care resources.
Objective |
To compare health care resource use and costs for patients with psoriasis among the 4 U.S. Census regions.
Methods |
Cross-sectional study using the 1996-2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.
Results |
In the United States the greatest access for biologic medications was in the South (9.1% receiving biologic medications/year), followed by the Northeast (7.4%), the West (6.8%), and the Midwest (5.2%). Ambulatory visits per patient per year were highest in the West (5.02), followed by the Northeast (3.81), the South (2.95), and the Midwest (2.84). The proportion of patients with ≥1 emergency department (ED) visits was highest in the Northeast (2.73%), followed by the West (2.17%), the South (1.19%), and the Midwest (1.17%). Compared with the remainder of the country, the West incurred the lowest total health care costs (P = .035) and the lowest drug costs (P = .023); and the Northeast incurred the highest total health care costs (P = .050) and the highest ambulatory costs (P < .001). Although the South had the greatest proportion of patients using biologic medications (9.1% vs 6.4%, P = .045), it also had 30% fewer ambulatory visits per patient per year and a 39% lower proportion of ED visits for psoriasis.
Limitations |
Data for psoriasis severity were unavailable.
Conclusions |
Southern U.S. states have the greatest access to biologic medications and incurred fewer ambulatory and ED visits. The Midwest had the lowest access to biologic medications and ambulatory and ED care. The West incurred the lowest total health care costs, while the Northeast incurred the highest total health care costs.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : biologics, costs, disparity, health care resources, location, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, population study, psoriasis, regions, United States
Abbreviations used : CI, ED, MEPS, PPPY
Plan
Funding sources: None. |
|
Conflicts of interest: Dr Armstrong has served as an investigator and advisor to AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, UCB, Dermira, Dermavant Sciences, Novartis, Kyowa Hakko Kirin (KHK), Ortho Dermatologics, Sanofi, Regeneron, and Modernizing Medicine. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. |
|
IRB approval status: Reviewed and approved by University of Southern California institutional review board (approval IIR00002254). |
|
Reprints not available from the authors. |
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?