S'abonner

Statewide Pediatric Facility Recognition Programs and Their Association with Pediatric Readiness in Emergency Departments in the United States - 20/02/20

Doi : 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.10.017 
Travis M. Whitfill, MPH 1, , Katherine E. Remick, MD 2, 3, 4, 5, Lenora M. Olson, PhD, MA 6, Rachel Richards, MStat 6, Kathleen M. Brown, MD 7, 8, Marc A. Auerbach, MD, MSci 1, Marianne Gausche-Hill, MD 9, 10, 11
1 Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 
2 Office of the Medical Director, Austin-Travis County EMS System, Austin, TX 
3 Dell Medical School at the University of Texas, Austin, TX 
4 San Marcos/Hays County EMS System, San Marcos, TX 
5 EMS for Children Innovation and Improvement Center, Houston, TX 
6 National Emergency Medical Services for Children Data Analysis Resource Center, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 
7 Department of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 
8 Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC 
9 Departments of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA 
10 Departments of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 
11 Emergency Medical Services Agency, Department of Health Services, Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, CA 

Reprint requests: Travis M. Whitfill, MPH, Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, 100 York Street, Suite 1F, New Haven, CT 06510.Department of PediatricsYale University School of Medicine100 York StreetSuite 1FNew HavenCT06510

Abstract

Objective

To describe the relationship between statewide pediatric facility recognition (PFR) programs and pediatric readiness in emergency departments (EDs) in the US.

Study design

Data were extracted from the 2013 National Pediatric Readiness Project assessment (4083 EDs). Pediatric readiness was assessed using the weighted pediatric readiness score (WPRS) based on a 100-point scale. Descriptive statistics were used to compare WPRS between recognized and nonrecognized EDs and between states with or without a PFR program. A linear mixed model with WPRS was used to evaluate state PFR programs on pediatric readiness.

Results

Eight states were identified with a PFR program. EDs in states with a PFR program had a higher WPRS compared with states without a PFR program (overall a 9.1-point higher median WPRS; P < .001); EDs recognized in a PFR program had a 21.7-point higher median WPRS compared with nonrecognized EDs (P < .001); and between states with a statewide PFR program, there was high variability of participation within the states. We found state-level PFR programs predicted a higher WPRS compared with states without a PFR program (β = 5.49; 95% CI 2.76-8.23).

Conclusions

Statewide PFR programs are based on national guidelines and identify those EDs that adhere to a standard level of readiness for children. These statewide PFR initiatives are associated with higher pediatric readiness. As scalable strategies are needed to improve emergency care for children, our study suggests that statewide PFR programs may be one way to improve pediatric readiness and underscores the need for further implementation and evaluation.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : pediatric readiness, emergency medicine, EMSC, facility recognition

Abbreviations : ED, EMSC, FRP, HRSA, NPRP, PFR, WPRS


Plan


 Additional funding and disclosure information is available at www.jpeds.com.


© 2019  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 218

P. 210 - mars 2020 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Twenty-Four-Hour Movement Guidelines and Body Weight in Youth
  • Xihe Zhu, Sean Healy, Justin A. Haegele, Freda Patterson
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Pediatric Heart Failure: An Evolving Public Health Concern
  • Stephanie J. Nakano, Shelley D. Miyamoto, Jack F. Price, Joseph W. Rossano, Antonio G. Cabrera

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.