S'abonner

Hypnotherapy or medications: a randomized noninferiority trial in urgency urinary incontinent women - 28/01/20

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.025 
Yuko M. Komesu, MD a, , Ronald M. Schrader, PhD b, Rebecca G. Rogers, MD a, c, Robert E. Sapien, MD a, Andrew R. Mayer, PhD d, Loren H. Ketai, MD a
a University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM 
b University of New Mexico Clinical and Translational Science Center, Albuquerque, NM 
c University of Texas Dell Medical School, Austin, TX 
d Mind Research Network, Albuquerque, NM 

Corresponding author: Yuko M. Komesu, MD.

Abstract

Background

Urgency urinary incontinence afflicts many adults, and most commonly affects women. Medications, a standard treatment, may be poorly tolerated, with poor adherence. This warrants investigation of alternative interventions. Mind–body therapies such as hypnotherapy may offer additional treatment options for individuals with urgency urinary incontinence.

Objective

To evaluate hypnotherapy’s efficacy compared to medications in treating women with urgency urinary incontinence.

Materials and Methods

This investigator-masked, noninferiority trial compared hypnotherapy to medications at an academic center in the southwestern United States, and randomized women with non-neurogenic urgency urinary incontinence to weekly hypnotherapy sessions for 2 months (and continued self-hypnosis thereafter) or to medication and weekly counseling for 2 months (and medication alone thereafter). The primary outcome was the between-group comparison of percent change in urgency incontinence on a 3-day bladder diary at 2 months. Important secondary outcomes were between-group comparisons of percent change in urgency incontinence at 6 and 12 months. Outcomes were analyzed based on noninferiority margins of 5% for between group differences (P < 0.025) (that is, for between group difference in percentage change in urgency incontinence, if the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval was greater than –5%, noninferiority would be proved).

Results

A total of 152 women were randomized to treatment between April 2013 and October 2016. Of these women, 142 (70 hypnotherapy, 72 medications) had 3-day diary information at 2 months and were included in the primary outcome analysis. Secondary outcomes were analyzed for women with diary data at the 6-month and then 12-month time points (138 women [67 hypnotherapy, 71 medications] at 6 months, 140 women [69 hypnotherapy, 71 medications] at 12 months. There were no differences between groups’ urgency incontinence episodes at baseline: median (quartile 1, quartile 3) for hypnotherapy was 8 (4, 14) and medication was 7 (4, 11) (P = .165). For the primary outcome, although both interventions showed improvement, hypnotherapy did not prove noninferior to medication at 2 months. Hypnotherapy’s median percent improvement was 73.0% (95% confidence interval, 60.0–88˖9%), whereas medication’s improvement was 88.6% (95% confidence interval, 78.6–100.0%). The median difference in percent change between groups was 0% (95% confidence interval, –16.7% to 0.0%); because the lower margin of the confidence interval did not meet the predetermined noninferiority margin of greater than –5%, hypnotherapy did not prove noninferior to medication. In contrast, hypnotherapy was noninferior to medication for the secondary outcomes at 6 months (hypnotherapy, 85.7% improvement, 95% confidence interval, 75.0–100%; medications, 83.3% improvement, 95% confidence interval, 64.7–100%; median difference in percent change between groups of 0%, 95% confidence interval, 0.0–6.7%) and 12 months (hypnotherapy, 85.7% improvement, 95% confidence interval, 66.7–94.4%; medications, 80% improvement, 95% confidence interval, 54.5–100%; median difference in percent change between groups of 0%, 95% confidence interval, –4.2% to –9.5%).

Conclusion

Both hypnotherapy and medications were associated with substantially improved urgency urinary incontinence at all follow-up. The study did not prove the noninferiority of hypnotherapy compared to medications at 2 months, the study’s primary outcome. Hypnotherapy proved noninferior to medications at longer-term follow-up of 6 and 12 months. Hypnotherapy is a promising, alternative treatment for women with UUI.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : hypnotherapy, mind-body therapy, pharmacotherapy, randomized trial in women, urgency urinary incontinence


Plan


 Drs Komesu, Ketai, Rogers, Sapien, Schrader, and Mayer received support from the National Institutions of Health (NIH) grant R01AT007171. Y.M.K. has received support from other NIH grants and is Site PI for the CookMyosite® CELLEBRATE trial. R.G.R. has received support from other NIH grants, UpToDate royalties, ABOG and ACOG travel and stipend, International Urogynecologic Association travel and stipend, and editorship. R.E.S. is International Board of Hypnotherapy Director, Global Hypnotherapy Advancement Foundation Board Member, CMO & Owner of Sapien Wellness LLC and It's Mental LLC. Dr. Sapien signed an agreement with the UNMH IRB that his Sapien Wellness and IT's mental LLC would not receive any payment for his activity in this study. A.R.M. has received support from other NIH grants.
 Support provided by the National Center for Complementary & Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Award Number R01AT007171. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutional Health.
 Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov; clinicaltrials.gov ID#: NCT01829425.
 Cite this article as: Komesu YM, Schrader RM, Rogers RG, et al. Hypnotherapy or medications: a randomized noninferiority trial in urgency urinary incontinent women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020;222:159.e1-16.


© 2019  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 222 - N° 2

P. 159.e1-159.e16 - février 2020 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Impact of oral metronidazole treatment on the vaginal microbiota and correlates of treatment failure
  • Marijn C. Verwijs, Stephen K. Agaba, Alistair C. Darby, Janneke H.H. M. van de Wijgert
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Association between adjuvant posterior repair and success of native tissue apical suspension
  • Gary Sutkin, Halina M. Zyczynski, Amaanti Sridhar, J. Eric Jelovsek, Charles R. Rardin, Donna Mazloomdoost, David D. Rahn, John N. Nguyen, Uduak U. Andy, Isuzu Meyer, Marie G. Gantz, NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.