Defining the relationship between vaginal and urinary microbiomes - 28/01/20
for the
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
Abstract |
Background |
Although the vaginal and urinary microbiomes have been increasingly well-characterized in health and disease, few have described the relationship between these neighboring environments. Elucidating this relationship has implications for understanding how manipulation of the vaginal microbiome may affect the urinary microbiome and treatment of common urinary conditions.
Objective |
To describe the relationship between urinary and vaginal microbiomes using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. We hypothesized that the composition of the urinary and vaginal microbiomes would be significantly associated, with similarities in predominant taxa.
Study Design |
This multicenter study collected vaginal swabs and catheterized urine samples from 186 women with mixed urinary incontinence enrolled in a parent study and 84 similarly aged controls. Investigators decided a priori that if vaginal and/or urinary microbiomes differed between continent and incontinent women, the groups would be analyzed separately; if similar, samples from continent and incontinent women would be pooled and analyzed together. A central laboratory sequenced variable regions 1–3 (v1–3) and characterized bacteria to the genus level. Operational taxonomic unit abundance was described for paired vaginal and urine samples. Pearson’s correlation characterized the relationship between individual operational taxonomic units of paired samples. Canonical correlation analysis evaluated the association between clinical variables (including mixed urinary incontinence and control status) and vaginal and urinary operational taxonomic units, using the Canonical correlation analysis function in the Vegan package (R version 3.5). Linear discriminant analysis effect size was used to find taxa that discriminated between vaginal and urinary samples.
Results |
Urinary and vaginal samples were collected from 212 women (mean age 53±11 years) and results from 197 paired samples were available for analysis. As operational taxonomic units in mixed urinary incontinence and control samples were related in canonical correlation analysis and since taxa did not discriminate between mixed urinary incontinence or controls in either vagina or urine, mixed urinary incontinence and control samples were pooled for further analysis. Canonical correlation analysis of vaginal and urinary samples indicated that that 60 of the 100 most abundant operational taxonomic units in the samples largely overlapped. Lactobacillus was the most abundant genus in both urine and vagina (contributing on average 53% to an individual’s urine sample and 64% to an individual’s vaginal sample) (Pearson correlation r=0.53). Although less abundant than Lactobacillus, other bacteria with high Pearson correlation coefficients also commonly found in vagina and urine included: Gardnerella (r=0.70), Prevotella (r=0.64), and Ureaplasma (r=0.50). Linear discriminant analysis effect size analysis identified Tepidimonas and Flavobacterium as bacteria that distinguished the urinary environment for both mixed urinary incontinence and controls as these bacteria were absent in the vagina (Tepidimonas effect size 2.38, P<.001, Flavobacterium effect size 2.15, P<.001). Although Lactobacillus was the most abundant bacteria in both urine and vagina, it was more abundant in the vagina (linear discriminant analysis effect size effect size 2.72, P<.001).
Conclusion |
Significant associations between vaginal and urinary microbiomes were demonstrated, with Lactobacillus being predominant in both urine and vagina. Abundance of other bacteria also correlated highly between the vagina and urine. This inter-relatedness has implications for studying manipulation of the urogenital microbiome in treating conditions such as urgency urinary incontinence and urinary tract infections.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : Lactobacillus, mixed urinary incontinence, urinary microbiome, urologic conditions, vaginal microbiome
Plan
Conflicts of interest include Y.K.: CookMyosite; D.L.D.: National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the NIH through grant numbers ULTR01449, KL2TR001448; H.E.R.: NICHD/Washington University, PCORI/Brown University, NIA/UT Southwestern, UpToDate, Pelvalon (research grant), Renovia (research grant), International Urogynecology Journal and Obstetrics and Gynecology Journal; E.S.L.: consulting for Axonics, research funding from Boston Scientific, Uroplasty/Coloplast, donated research material from Pfizer, royalties from UptoDate; N.Y.S.: Medtronic, UpToDate, K23-DK110417 from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK); B.R.: Coloplast, Ethicon; and R.G.R.: UptoDate, ABOG Board member, International Urogynecology Journal and Obstetrics and Gynecology Journal. The other authors report no conflicts of interest. |
|
Supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development sponsored this Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (PFDN) study. Other support: National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (grant number ULTR001449, the University of New Mexico Clinical and Translational Science Center) (for performance of DNA extraction, 16S sequencing). |
|
Cite this article as: Komesu YM, Dinwiddie DL, Richter HE, et al. Defining the relationship between vaginal and urinary microbiomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020;222:154.e1-10. |
Vol 222 - N° 2
P. 154.e1-154.e10 - février 2020 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?