Early studies of renal artery denervation (RAD) demonstrated efficacy in treating resistant hypertension patients with significant reduction in office blood pressure (BP). This resulted in a growing enthusiasm in the field and a rapid evolution of technology with expanding procedural indications. However, the first randomised sham-controlled trial, Symplicity HTN-3, failed to demonstrate a significant difference in BP reduction between the RAD and the sham control arm, which subsequently led to a major reduction in the clinical application of this procedure. Additionally, the results generated further interest into understanding the mechanism and factors affecting procedural success and identifying the limitations within the field. Many lessons were learned from Symplicity HTN-3 trial, and with recent evidence emerging for RAD in hypertension treatment, the field continues to be refined.