Histopathologic features distinguishing secondary syphilis from its mimickers - 11/12/19
, Veronica Merelo Alcocer, MD a, Viktoryia Kazlouskaya, MD, PhD b, Eun Ji Kwon, MD c, Dirk Elston, MD dAbstract |
Background |
Syphilis is often misdiagnosed clinically, and biopsies might be required.
Objective |
To determine histopathologic features that distinguish secondary syphilis from pityriasis lichenoides (PL), pityriasis rosea (PR), and early mycosis fungoides (MF).
Methods |
Histopathologic features of 100 cases of syphilis, 110 cases of PL, 72 cases of PR, and 101 cases of MF were compared.
Results |
Elongated rete ridges and interstitial inflammation favor syphilis over PL (likelihood ratios 3.44 and 2.72, respectively), but no feature reliably distinguishes between them. Secondary syphilis and PR can be distinguished by neutrophils in the stratum corneum, plasma cells, interface dermatitis with lymphocytes and vacuoles, and lymphocytes with ample cytoplasm. Plasma cells and lymphocytes with ample cytoplasm are rare in early MF and can be used as distinguishing features.
Conclusions |
Histopathologic features characteristic of syphilis can be seen in PL, PR, and early MF. Distinguishing syphilis from PL can be difficult histologically, and a high index of suspicion is required. Although elongation of rete and interstitial inflammation favor syphilis, plasma cells (historically considered a significant feature of syphilis) are often encountered in PL. Vacuolar interface dermatitis with a lymphocyte in every vacuole is considered characteristic of PL, but this feature appears to be more common in syphilis.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : dermatopathology, mycosis fungoides, pityriasis lichenoides, pityriasis rosea, secondary syphilis, syphilis
Abbreviations used : LR, MF, PL, PR
Plan
| Funding sources: None. |
|
| Conflicts of interest: None disclosed. |
Vol 82 - N° 1
P. 156-160 - janvier 2020 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Improved overall survival of melanoma of the head and neck treated with Mohs micrographic surgery versus wide local excision
- Jamie Hanson, Addison Demer, Walter Liszewski, Neal Foman, Ian Maher
- Joint American Academy of Dermatology–National Psoriasis Foundation guidelines of care for the management and treatment of psoriasis in pediatric patients
- Alan Menter, Kelly M. Cordoro, Dawn M.R. Davis, Daniela Kroshinsky, Amy S. Paller, April W. Armstrong, Cody Connor, Boni E. Elewski, Joel M. Gelfand, Kenneth B. Gordon, Alice B. Gottlieb, Daniel H. Kaplan, Arthur Kavanaugh, Matthew Kiselica, Dario Kivelevitch, Neil J. Korman, Mark Lebwohl, Craig L. Leonardi, Jason Lichten, Henry W. Lim, Nehal N. Mehta, Sylvia L. Parra, Arun L. Pathy, Elizabeth A. Farley Prater, Reena N. Rupani, Michael Siegel, Benjamin Stoff, Bruce E. Strober, Emily B. Wong, Jashin J. Wu, Vidhya Hariharan, Craig A. Elmets
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?