Recategorization of psoriasis severity: Delphi consensus from the International Psoriasis Council - 11/12/19
, Caitriona Ryan, MD c, Peter van de Kerkhof, MD, PhD d, Joelle van der Walt, PhD d, ⁎ , Alexa B. Kimball, MD, MPH e, Jonathan Barker, MD, FRCP, FRCPath f, Andrew Blauvelt, MD, MBA gon behalf of
International Psoriasis Council Board Members and Councilors
Abstract |
Background |
Psoriasis severity categories have been important tools for clinicians to use in treatment decisions as well as to determine eligibility criteria for clinical studies. However, owing to the heterogeneity of severity classifications and their lack of consideration for the impact of psoriasis involvement of special areas or past treatment history, patients may be miscategorized, which can lead to undertreatment of psoriasis.
Objective |
To develop a consensus statement on the classification of psoriasis severity.
Methods |
A modified Delphi approach was developed by the International Psoriasis Council to define psoriasis severity.
Results |
After completion of the exercise, 7 severity definitions were preferentially ranked. This most preferred statement rejects the mild, moderate, and severe categories in favor of a dichotomous definition: Psoriasis patients should be classified as either candidates for topical therapy or candidates for systemic therapy; the latter are patients who meet at least one of the following criteria: (1) body surface area >10%, (2) disease involving special areas, and (3) failure of topical therapy.
Limitations |
This effort might have suffered from a lack of representation by all relevant stakeholders, including patients.
Conclusion |
The consensus statement describes 2 categories of psoriasis severity, while accounting for special circumstances where patients may require systemic therapy.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : BSA, psoriasis, severity, systemics, topicals
Abbreviations used : BSA, DLQI, IPC, PASI, PDI, PGA
Plan
| Funding sources: None. |
|
| Conflicts of interest: Dr Strober has acted as a consultant and received honoraria from AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Arena, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Celgene, Dermavant, Dermira, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Eli Lilly, Medac, Meiji Seika Pharma, Sebela Pharmaceuticals, Menlo Therapeutics, Novartis, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, UCB Pharma, Sirtris, Sun Pharma, Ortho Dermatologics/Valeant, Regeneron, and Sanofi-Genzyme. Dr Strober has served as investigator (no direct payments made to Dr Strober) for AbbVie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Galderma, and Sienna. Dr Strober has received consulting fee as Scientific Director for the Corrona Psoriasis Registry and grant support to the University of Connecticut for Fellowship Program (payments to the University of Connecticut, not Dr Strober) from AbbVie, Janssen, and the National Psoriasis Foundation. Dr Ryan has received compensation as a speaker, consultant, or advisor for AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dermira, Dr Reddys, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Novartis, Regeneron-Sanofi, and UCB. Dr van de Kerkhof received fees for consultancy service or lectureships from Celgene, Allmirall, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Jansen Pharmaceutica, LEO Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squib, and Dermavant. Dr Kimball has received compensation as a consultant and an investigator for Novartis, AbbVie, UCB, Lilly, and Janssen and has received fellowship funding from Janssen and AbbVie. Dr Kimball is a consultant to Amirall and shareholder and consultant to BMS. Dr Barker has served as an advisory board member and received honoraria from AbbVie, Almirall, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, LEO Pharma, Samsung, Sienna Bio, Sun Pharma, and UCB and has received research grant funding from Pfizer. Dr Blauvelt has served as a scientific adviser and/or clinical study investigator for AbbVie, Aclaris, Akros, Allergan, Almirall, Amgen, Arena, Athenex, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Dermavant, Dermira, Inc, Eli Lilly, FLX Bio, Galderma, Genentech/Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Meiji, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Purdue Pharma, Regeneron, Revance, Sandoz, Sanofi, Genzyme, Sienna Pharmaceuticals, Sun Pharma, UCB Pharma, Valeant, and Vidac, and as a paid speaker for AbbVie, Regeneron, and Sanofi Genzyme. Dr van der Walt has no conflicts of interest to declare. |
Vol 82 - N° 1
P. 117-122 - janvier 2020 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Number of skin biopsies needed per malignancy: Comparing the use of skin biopsies among dermatologists and nondermatologist clinicians
- Ashley Privalle, Thomas Havighurst, KyungMann Kim, Daniel D. Bennett, Yaohui G. Xu
- Topical cholesterol/lovastatin for the treatment of porokeratosis: A pathogenesis-directed therapy
- Lihi Atzmony, Young H. Lim, Claire Hamilton, Jonathan S. Leventhal, Annette Wagner, Amy S. Paller, Keith A. Choate
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?