Taux de publication des abstracts présentés au congrès de l’European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) - 05/12/19
Publication rate of abstracts presented at the Congress of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT)
, Fabian Langer b, Philipp Lechler c, Friederike Schröder a, Mark Wetterkamp a, Tobias Ludger Schulte a, Peer Eysel b, Christoph Kolja Boese bAbstract |
Background |
The publication rate of presented abstracts is an important parameter to assess the scientific quality of medical congresses. It has been investigated for many congresses in orthopaedics and traumatology, but until now it has not been studied for the congress of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT). The aims of this study were to determine: 1) the publication rate of the EFORT congress, 2) factors that favour publication of abstracts presented at the EFORT congress, 3) the consistency between the congress abstract and publication in relation to authorship.
Hypothesis |
There are factors that favour publication of abstracts presented at the EFORT congress and there is a high consistency between the congress abstract and publication in relation to authorship.
Materials and methods |
All 1624 abstracts presented at the EFORT congress in 2011 were included in this study, to allow a 5-year period for publication after the congress. The characteristics of the abstracts presented were studied and the publication rate in peer-reviewed journals was determined using a Medline search.
Results |
The publication rate for studies presented at the 2011 EFORT congress was 42% (677/1624 abstracts), with a mean of 16 months (−56 to 60 months) between congress and publication. The mean impact factor of the publications was 1.8 (0–7.6). A significantly higher publication rate was found for: oral presentations (52%; 322/617) versus posters (35%; 355/1007) (p<0.01), experimental studies (53%; 110/208) versus clinical studies (40%; 507/1254) (p<0.01), and studies with higher levels of evidence of I or II (59%; 144/244) versus studies with lower levels of evidence of III or IV (36%; 362/1005) (p<0.01). A new author was added in 59% (403/677) of the publications.
Discussion |
Factors that favour publication of abstracts presented at the EFORT congress are oral presentation, experimental study, and a study with a higher level of evidence of I or II. It is common that a new author is added in the publication. Nevertheless, a high percentage of congress abstracts (58%; 947/1624) remains unpublished.
Level of evidence |
IV, Retrospective study.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Publication rate, Congress, Orthopaedics, Traumatology, EFORT
| ☆ | Cet article peut être consulté in extenso dans la version anglaise de la revue Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research sur Science Direct (sciencedirect.com) en utilisant le DOI ci-dessus. |
Vol 105 - N° 8
P. 941 - décembre 2019 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Quel est le taux de publication faisant suite à une communication au congrès de la SOFCOT ? Analyse de l’année 2013
- Roger Erivan, Julien Dartus, Nicolas Reina, Matthieu Ollivier, Guillaume Villatte, Marc Saab, Patrick Devos
- Les 100 articles les plus cités d’Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research depuis sa création
- Roger Erivan, Guillaume Villatte, Matthieu Ollivier, Nicolas Reina, Stéphane Descamps, Stéphane Boisgard
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?