Procedural Experience With Intubation: Results From a National Emergency Medicine Group - 25/11/19
Abstract |
Study objective |
Although intubation is a commonly discussed procedure in emergency medicine, the number of opportunities for emergency physicians to perform it is unknown. We determine the frequency of intubation performed by emergency physicians in a national emergency medicine group.
Methods |
Using data from a national emergency medicine group (135 emergency departments [EDs] in 19 states, 2010 to 2016), we determined intubation incidence per physician, including intubations per year, intubations per 100 clinical hours, and intubations per 1,000 ED patient visits. We report medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) for estimated intubation rates among emergency physicians working in general EDs (those treating mixed adult and pediatric populations).
Results |
We analyzed 53,904 intubations performed by 2,108 emergency physicians in general EDs (53,265 intubations) and pediatric EDs (639 intubations). Intubation incidence varied among general ED emergency physicians (median 10 intubations per year; IQR 5 to 17; minimum 0, maximum 109). Approximately 5% of emergency physicians did not perform any intubations in a given year. During the study, 24.1% of general ED emergency physicians performed fewer than 5 intubations per year (range 21.2% in 2010 to 25.7% in 2016). Emergency physicians working in general EDs performed a median of 0.7 intubations per 100 clinical hours (IQR 0.3 to 1.1) and 2.7 intubations per 1,000 ED patient visits (IQR 1.2 to 4.6).
Conclusion |
These findings provide insights into the frequency with which emergency physicians perform intubations.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Please see page 787 for the Editor’s Capsule Summary of this article. |
|
Supervising editor: Henry E. Wang, MD, MS. Specific detailed information about possible conflict of interest for individual editors is available at editors. |
|
Author contributions: JNC, JMP, AC, and AV conceived the study. KM oversaw the detailed chart quality control and data extraction described. MZ performed the statistical analysis of the study. JNC, MZ, AC, and AV drafted the article. All authors conducted a critical review and revision of the article. AV takes responsibility for the paper as a whole. |
|
All authors attest to meeting the four ICMJE.org authorship criteria: (1) Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND (2) Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND (3) Final approval of the version to be published; AND (4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. |
|
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org/). Dr. Carlson is funded by the American Heart Association. |
|
Readers: click on the link to go directly to a survey in which you can provide 2TNLBNJ to Annals on this particular article. |
|
A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com. |
Vol 74 - N° 6
P. 786-794 - décembre 2019 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?