Small-for-gestational-age birth is linked to cardiovascular dysfunction in early childhood - 15/11/19
Abstract |
Background |
The aim of this study was to assess clinical and echographic markers of cardiovascular dysfunction in infants born small for gestational age (SGA) compared to a control group of subjects born adequate for gestational age (AGA).
Methods |
This was a single-center cross-sectional case-control study. We recruited 20 SGA and 20 gestational age–matched AGA subjects at 24 months of age.
The study population underwent anthropometric and Doppler 2-dimensional echocardiographic assessments, and carotid artery intima-media thickness (cIMT) and endothelium-dependent vasodilation evaluation (FMD).
The pressure-volume curve during diastole was calculated using the algorithm for the elastance calculation on 1 single beat.
Results |
SGA children showed lower stroke volume, lower left ventricle (LV) dimensions and volume, and greater LV thickness. Diastolic function was impaired in SGA with lower capacitance and higher elastance.
Birth weight standard deviation score was positively associated with capacitance and negatively associated with E/E’ ratio and elastance, and in SGA infants, the end-diastolic pressure-related volume curve was shifted to the left compared to AGA.
cIMT and systemic vascular resistance were significantly higher, while FMD was lower, in SGA compared to AGA; birth weight standard deviation score was directly correlated with FMD and inversely correlated with cIMT.
Finally, a longer breastfeeding duration was associated to a lower cIMT even after correction for confounding factors.
Conclusions |
This study shows that infants born SGA present an early and subtle cardiovascular dysfunction compared to AGA controls. These alterations are strongly related to weight at birth. Finally, breastfeeding exerts an important protective and beneficial cardiovascular effect.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Acknowledgements of grant support: No financial assistance was received in support of the study. |
|
Conflicts of interest: none. |
Vol 217
P. 84-93 - novembre 2019 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?