S'abonner

Clinical effects of robot-assisted gait training and treadmill training for Parkinson's disease. A randomized controlled trial - 20/09/19

Doi : 10.1016/j.rehab.2019.06.016 
Marianna Capecci a, , Sanaz Pournajaf b, Daniele Galafate b, Patrizio Sale b, c, Domenica Le Pera b, Michela Goffredo b, Maria Francesca De Pandis d, Elisa Andrenelli a, Mauro Pennacchioni a, Maria Gabriella Ceravolo a, Marco Franceschini b, e
a Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Neurorehabilitation Clinic, University Hospital of Ancona, “Politecnica delle Marche” University, Ancona, Italy 
b Rehabilitation Department IRCCS San Raffaele-Pisana, Rome, Italy 
c Ospedale Sant’Isidoro Trescore Balneario FERB Onlus, Italy 
d San Raffaele Cassino Rehabilitation Institute, Cassino, Italy 
e San Raffaele University, Rome, Italy 

Corresponding author. Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Università Politecnica delle Marche, via Tronto 10, 60126 Ancona, Italy.Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Università Politecnica delle Marchevia Tronto 10Ancona60126Italy

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.

Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!

Highlights

This randomised controlled trial compared robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) to treadmill training (TT) for people with Parkinson's disease.
RAGT and TT improved overall gait capacity to the same extent.
RAGT was more effective than TT in improving freezing of gait (FOG).
RAGT reduced FOG more in dependent walkers than independent walkers.
Disability level was reduced in freezers more than in non-freezers.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Abstract

Background

Although gait disorders strongly contribute to perceived disability in people with Parkinson's disease, clinical trials have failed to identify which task-oriented gait training method can provide the best benefit. Freezing of gait remains one of the least investigated and most troublesome symptoms.

Objective

We aimed to compare the effects of robot-assisted gait training and treadmill training on endurance and gait capacity in people with Parkinson disease; the secondary aim was to compare the effect of the treatments in people with freezing and/or severe gait disability and assess changes in overall disease-related disability and quality of life.

Methods

Outpatients with Parkinson disease (Hoehn and Yahr stage2) were randomly assigned to receive 20 sessions of 45-min gait training assisted by an end-effector robotic device (G-EO System) or treadmill training. Outcome assessments were the 6-min walk test, Timed Up and Go test, Freezing of Gait Questionnaire, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scales and Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire-39 administered before (T0) and after treatment (T1).

Results

We included 96 individuals with Parkinson disease: 48 with robot-assisted gait training and 48 treadmill training. Both groups showed significant improvement in all outcomes. As compared with baseline, with robot-assisted gait training and treadmill training, endurance and gait capacity were enhanced by 18% and 12%, respectively, and motor symptoms and quality of life were improved by 17% and 15%. The maximum advantage was observed with the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire score, which decreased by 20% after either treatment. On post-hoc analysis, dependent walkers benefited more than independent walkers from any gait training, whereas freezers gained more from robot-assisted than treadmill training in terms of freezing reduction.

Conclusions

Repetitive intensive gait training is an effective treatment for people with Parkinson disease and can increase endurance and gait velocity, especially for those with severe walking disability. Advantages are greater with robot-assisted gait training than treadmill training for individuals with freezing of gait – related disability.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Gait, Robotics, Parkinson disease, Rehabilitation, Freezing


Plan


© 2019  Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 62 - N° 5

P. 303-312 - septembre 2019 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Editorial board
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Effectiveness of upper-limb robotic-assisted therapy in the early rehabilitation phase after stroke: A single-blind, randomised, controlled trial
  • Stéphanie Dehem, Maxime Gilliaux, Gaëtan Stoquart, Christine Detrembleur, Géraldine Jacquemin, Sara Palumbo, Anne Frederick, Thierry Lejeune

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.