S'abonner

Care Quality and Variability in the Use of Intravesical Therapy for Initial Treatment of Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Within a Large, Diverse Integrated Delivery System - 23/08/19

Doi : 10.1016/j.urology.2019.03.035 
Kim N. Danforth a, , Margo A. Sidell a, Tiffany Q. Luong a, David K. Yi a, Ayae Yamamoto a, b, Aniket A. Kawatkar a, Philip H. Kim c, Ronald K. Loo d, Stephen G. Williams e
a Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA 
b Department of Quality and Risk Management, Kaiser Foundation Hospital and Health Plan, Pasadena, CA 
c Department of Urology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, San Diego, CA 
d Department of Urology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Downey, CA 
e Department of Urology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Riverside, CA 

Address correspondence to: Kim N. Danforth, Sc.D., M.P.H., Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 S Los Robles Ave, 2nd Floor, Pasadena, CA 91101.Department of Research & EvaluationKaiser Permanente Southern California100 S Los Robles Ave, 2nd FloorPasadenaCA91101

Abstract

Objectives

To examine treatment variability, disparities, and quality among newly diagnosed nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients, and to identify factors associated with treatment use in a large, diverse integrated delivery system.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study of 5386 NMIBC patients diagnosed between January 2001 and June 2015 within Kaiser Permanente Southern California. Electronic health data were used to identify treatment outcomes and patient, provider, and tumor characteristics. Outcomes were use of (1) postoperative intravesical chemotherapy, (2) induction Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) immunotherapy, and (3) any intravesical therapy. Multivariable odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using generalized linear mixed models with a binary outcome and urologist as a random effect.

Results

From 2001 to 2015, 41% of newly diagnosed NMIBC patients were treated with intravesical therapy. Postoperative chemotherapy use increased significantly over this period (OR per-year = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.07-1.25). BCG use was strongly associated with tumor characteristics: patients with high-grade or carcinoma in situ tumors were more likely to receive BCG (OR = 10.10, 95% CI: 8.39-12.16). Few treatment differences were found by sex or race/ethnicity, but were observed by age. Wide treatment variability across urologists was observed, with some urologists never using intravesical therapy as part of initial treatment while others almost always used it. Differences across urologists accounted for more variability in postoperative chemotherapy (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.52) than BCG immunotherapy (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.11) use.

Conclusion

Substantial variability in initial treatment of NMIBC was observed across urologists, accounting for tumor, patient, and provider characteristics. Results suggest a considerable opportunity for quality improvement programs to reduce unwanted treatment variability and improve care for patients.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Funding Support: Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R21CA185931. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
 Financial Disclosure: The authors have no relevant financial interests.


© 2019  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 131

P. 93-103 - septembre 2019 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Synchronous Urothelial Bladder and Renal Malignancies. Case Report and Review of Urologic Cancers in Patients With Familial Rb Mutations
  • Gabriel Z. Leinwand, Jacob W. Greenberg, Andrew B. Sholl, L. Spencer Krane
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • EDITORIAL COMMENT
  • Florian R. Schroeck

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.