S'abonner

Overuse of Cystoscopic Surveillance Among Patients With Low-risk Non–Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer – A National Study of Patient, Provider, and Facility Factors - 23/08/19

Doi : 10.1016/j.urology.2019.04.036 
David S. Han a, Kristine E. Lynch b, Ji won Chang b, Brenda Sirovich c, Douglas J. Robertson c, Amanda R. Swanton d, John D. Seigne d, e, Philip P. Goodney c, Florian R. Schroeck a, c, d, e,
a The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH 
b VA Salt Lake City Health Care System and the Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 
c The White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT 
d Section of Urology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 
e Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 

Address correspondence to: Florian R. Schroeck, M.D., M.S., VA Outcomes Group, White River Junction VA Medical Center, 215 N Main Street, White River Junction, VT 05009.VA Outcomes Group, White River Junction VA Medical Center215 N Main StreetWhite River JunctionVT05009

ABSTRACT

Objective

To understand cystoscopic surveillance practices among patients with low-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

Methods

Using a validated natural language processing algorithm, we included patients newly diagnosed with low-risk (ie low-grade Ta) NMIBC from 2005 to 2011 in the VA. Patients were followed until cancer recurrence, death, last contact, or 2 years after diagnosis. Based on guidelines, surveillance overuse was defined as >1 cystoscopy if followed <1 year, >2 cystoscopies if followed 1 to <2 years, or >3 cystoscopies if followed for 2 years. We identified patient, provider, and facility factors associated with overuse using multilevel logistic regression.

Results

Overuse occurred in 75% of patients (852/1135) – with an excess of 1846 more cystoscopies performed than recommended. Adjusting for 14 factors, overuse was associated with patient race (odds ratio [OR] 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28, 0.85 unlisted race vs White), having 2 comorbidities (OR 1.60, 95% CI: 1.00, 2.55 vs no comorbidities), and earlier year of diagnosis (OR 2.50, 95% CI: 1.29, 4.83 for 2005 vs 2011, and OR 2.03, 95% CI: 1.11, 3.69 for 2006 vs 2011). On sensitivity analyses assuming all patients were diagnosed with multifocal or large low-grade tumors (ie, intermediate-risk), overuse would have still occurred in 45% of patients.

Conclusion

Overuse of cystoscopy among patients with low-risk NMIBC was common, raising concerns about bladder cancer surveillance cost and quality. However, few factors were associated with overuse. Further qualitative research is needed to identify other determinants of overuse not readily captured in administrative data.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not constitute official opinions of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
 Declarations of Interest: JDS, 100 common stock of Johnson and Johnson. All additional co-authors have no conflict of interest.
 Funding: FRS is supported by a Conquer Cancer Foundation Career Development Award and by the Dow-Crichlow Award of the Department of Surgery at the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center. PPG is supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development (IIR 15-085, 1I01HX001880-01A2). VA/Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data was received and used with support from the VA Information Resource Center, SDR 02-237.


© 2019  Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 131

P. 112-119 - septembre 2019 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Change in Functional Status After Prostate Cancer Treatment Among Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries
  • Bruce L. Jacobs, Samia H. Lopa, Jonathan G. Yabes, Joel B. Nelson, Amber E. Barnato, Howard B. Degenholtz
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • EDITORIAL COMMENT
  • Pratik M.S. Gurung, Edward E. Messing, Jean V. Joseph

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.