S'abonner

Change in Functional Status After Prostate Cancer Treatment Among Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries - 23/08/19

Doi : 10.1016/j.urology.2019.05.029 
Bruce L. Jacobs a, , Samia H. Lopa a, Jonathan G. Yabes b, c, Joel B. Nelson a, Amber E. Barnato d, e, Howard B. Degenholtz f
a Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 
b Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 
c Department of Medicine, Center for Research on Health Care, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 
d Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH 
e Dartmouth Institute Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH 
f Department of Health Policy Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 

Address correspondence to: Bruce L. Jacobs, M.D., M.P.H., Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh, 5200 Centre Avenue, Suite 209, Pittsburgh, PA 15232.Department of UrologyUniversity of Pittsburgh5200 Centre Avenue, Suite 209PittsburghPA15232

Abstract

Objective

To examine the relationship between treatment and subsequent functional status among prostate cancer patients.

Methods

Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare Health Outcomes Survey data, we identified men 65 years or older diagnosed with prostate cancer between 1998 and 2009 (follow-up through 2010) who were treated with conservative management, surgery, or radiation. Our primary outcome was functional status as measured by activities of daily living. Secondary outcomes included physical component summary and mental component summary scores, which are both calculated from the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and the Veterans RAND 12-item health survey (VR-12) questionnaires. We included patients who completed 2 surveys and performed propensity score analyses to match patients 1:5 with noncancer controls. We used generalized linear mixed effects models, accounting for clustering due to insurance plan.

Results

We identified 408 patients of whom 143 (35%) underwent conservative management, 59 (14%) underwent surgery, and 206 (51%) underwent radiation. Among conservative management and radiation patients, changes in functional status mirrored that of their noncancer controls (all P > .05). Among surgery patients, changes in activities of daily living scores were not significant, but physical component summary (mean difference = 4.5, P < .001) and mental component summary (mean difference = 3.3, P = .01) scores declined slightly more than for their noncancer peers.

Conclusion

Surgery patients had a slight decline in their general functional status whereas conservative management and radiation patients had no differences in functional status compared with their noncancer peers. Although the functional status of surgery patients declined more than that of their noncancer peers, this difference may not be clinically significant.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Financial Disclosure: These are financial disclosures, but not conflicts of interest: there are no conflicts of interest for this manuscript.
Amber Barnato is a former board member of the Society of Medical Decision Making.
 Funding: Bruce Jacobs is supported in part by the National Institutes of Health GEMSSTAR award (R03AG048091) and the 100007921 Physicians Foundation.
Jonathan Yabes is supported in part by the University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science Institute – Research Education and Career Development 501100000350 (UL1 TR000005)
Amber Barnato is supported in part by the Levy Cluster in Health Care Delivery at Dartmouth.
Howard Degenholtz is supported in part by a grant from the Health Resources Services Administration.
 Author contributions
Bruce Jacobs: Conception and design, data acquisition, data analysis and interpretation, drafting of manuscript, critical revision of the manuscript, and statistical analyses.
Samia Lopa: Conception and design, data acquisition, data analysis and interpretation, critical revision of the manuscript, and statistical analyses.
Jonathan Yabes: Conception and design, data acquisition, data analysis and interpretation, critical revision of the manuscript, and statistical analyses.
Joel Nelson: Conception and design, data analysis and interpretation, critical revision of the manuscript, supervision.
Amber Barnato: Conception and design, data analysis and interpretation, drafting of manuscript, critical revision of the manuscript, supervision.
Howard Degenholtz: Conception and design, data analysis and interpretation, drafting of manuscript, critical revision of the manuscript, supervision.


© 2019  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 131

P. 104-111 - septembre 2019 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • AUTHOR REPLY
  • Kim N. Danforth, Philip H. Kim, Margo A. Sidell, Ronald K. Loo, Stephen G. Williams
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Overuse of Cystoscopic Surveillance Among Patients With Low-risk Non–Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer – A National Study of Patient, Provider, and Facility Factors
  • David S. Han, Kristine E. Lynch, Ji won Chang, Brenda Sirovich, Douglas J. Robertson, Amanda R. Swanton, John D. Seigne, Philip P. Goodney, Florian R. Schroeck

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.