S'abonner

Small-for-Gestational Age Birth Confers Similar Educational Performance through Middle School - 19/08/19

Doi : 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.04.055 
Karna Murthy, MD, MSc 1, 2, , Krzysztof Karbownik, PhD 3, 4, Craig F. Garfield, MD, MAPP 1, 2, 5, Gustave H. Falciglia, MD, MSc 1, 2, Jeffrey Roth, PhD 6, David N. Figlio, PhD 4, 5, 7
1 Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 
2 Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 
3 Department of Economics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 
4 National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA 
5 Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 
6 Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 
7 School of Education and Social Policy, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 

Reprint requests: Karna Murthy, MD, Division of Neonatology, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, 225 East Chicago Ave, Box #45, Chicago, IL 60611.Division of NeonatologyAnn and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago225 East Chicago AveBox #45ChicagoIL60611

Abstract

Objective

To estimate the association between small for gestational age (SGA) at birth and educational performance on standardized testing and disability prevalence in elementary and middle school.

Study design

Through linked birth certificates and school records, surviving infants born at 23-41 weeks of gestation who entered Florida's public schools 1998-2009 were identified. Twenty-three SGA definitions (3rd-25th percentile) were derived. Outcomes were scores on Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) and students' disability classification in grades 3 through 8. A “sibling cohort” subsample included families with at least 2 siblings from the same mother in the study period. Multivariable models estimated independent relationships between SGA and outcomes.

Results

Birth certificates for 80.2% of singleton infants were matched to Florida public school records (N = 1 254 390). Unadjusted mean FCAT scores were 0.236 SD lower among <10th percentile SGA infants compared with non-SGA infants; this difference declined to −0.086 SD after adjusting for maternal and infant characteristics. When siblings discordant in SGA status were compared within individual families, the association declined to −0.056 SD. For SGA <10th percentile infants, the observed prevalence of school-age disability was 15.0%, 7.7%, and 6.3% for unadjusted, demographics-adjusted, and sibling analyses, respectively. No inflection or discontinuity was detected across SGA definitions from 3rd to 25th percentile in either outcome, and the associations were qualitatively similar.

Conclusions

The associations between SGA birth and students' standardized test scores and well-being were quantitatively small but persisted through elementary and middle school. The observed deficits were largely mitigated by demographic and familial factors.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : SGA, child development, longitudinal data, test scores

Abbreviations : SGA, FCAT


Plan


 Supported by the National Science Foundation (0338740 [to D.F. and J.R.]), the U.S. Department of Education (R305C120008 [to D.F.]), and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation through the National Center for the Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research (OPP1029884 [to D.F. and J.R.]). The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


© 2019  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 212

P. 159 - septembre 2019 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Implications of Mothers' Social Networks for Risky Infant Sleep Practices
  • Rachel Y. Moon, Rebecca F. Carlin, Benjamin Cornwell, Anita Mathews, Rosalind P. Oden, Yao I. Cheng, Linda Y. Fu, Jichuan Wang
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Attributable Delay of Discharge for Children with Long-Term Mechanical Ventilation
  • Sarah A. Sobotka, Carolyn Foster, Emma Lynch, Lindsey Hird-McCorry, Denise M. Goodman

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.