There have been a number of angiogenic gene therapy trials, yielding mixed results as to efficacy, but demonstrating uniform short-term treatment safety. Data regarding long-term safety of angiogenic gene therapy are limited. Double-blind VIF-CAD trial (NCT00620217) assessed myocardial perfusion and clinical data in 52 refractory coronary artery disease (CAD) patients randomized into treatment (VIF; n = 33) and Placebo (n = 19) arms. VIF group received electromechanical system NOGA-guided intramyocardial injections of VEGF-A165/bFGF plasmid (VIF) into ischemic regions, while the Placebo group—placebo plasmid injections. Full 1-year follow-up data have been published. This study presents the results of over 10-year (median 133 months, range 95-149) safety follow-up of VIF-CAD patients. Overall, 12 (36.4%) patients died in VIF and 8 (42.1%) in Placebo group (P = .68). Cardiovascular mortality was 12/33 (36.4%) in the VIF group and 6/19 (31.6%) in Placebo group (P = .73). Two Placebo patients died due to malignancies, but no VIF patients (P = .17). The Kaplan-Meier curves of combined endpoint: cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction and stroke were similar for both patient groups (P = .71). Odds ratio of Placebo group increasing (reaching a worse) their CCS class versus VIF was non-significant (OR 1.28, 95% CI = 0.66-2.45; P = .47). However, CCS class improved in time irrespectively of treatment—OR of reaching a less favorable CCS class per each year of follow-up was 0.74 (95% CI 0.685-0.792; P < .0001, pooled data). There were no differences in readmission rates.

Intramyocardial VEGF-A165/bFGF plasmid administration appears safe, with no evidence of an increase in the incidence of death, malignancy, myocardial infarction or stroke during 10-year follow-up in this limited patient population.