S'abonner

Prehospital Analgesia With Intranasal Ketamine (PAIN-K): A Randomized Double-Blind Trial in Adults - 20/07/19

Doi : 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.01.048 
Gary Andolfatto, MD a, c, , Kelsey Innes, MD a, William Dick, MD a, Sandra Jenneson, MD a, Elaine Willman, MD d, Robert Stenstrom, MD a, Peter J. Zed, PharmD a, b, Gene Benoit, CCP e
a Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 
b Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 
c Emergency Department, Lions Gate Hospital, North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 
d Department of Pathology, Surrey Memorial Hospital, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada 
e British Columbia Emergency Health Services, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 

Corresponding Author.

Abstract

Study objective

We compare intranasal ketamine with intranasal placebo in providing pain reduction at 30 minutes when added to usual paramedic care with nitrous oxide.

Methods

This was a randomized double-blind study of out-of-hospital patients with acute pain who reported a verbal numeric rating scale (VNRS) pain score greater than or equal to 5. Exclusion criteria were younger than 18 years, known ketamine intolerance, nontraumatic chest pain, altered mental status, pregnancy, and nasal occlusion. Patients received usual paramedic care and were randomized to receive either intranasal ketamine or intranasal saline solution at 0.75 mg/kg. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with VNRS score reduction greater than or equal to 2 at 30 minutes. Secondary outcomes were pain reduction at 15 minutes, patient-reported comfort, satisfaction scores, nitrous oxide consumption, and incidence of adverse events.

Results

One hundred twenty subjects were enrolled. Seventy-six percent of intranasal ketamine patients versus 41% of placebo patients reported a greater than or equal to 2-point VNRS reduction at 30 minutes (difference 35%; 95% confidence interval 17% to 51%). Median VNRS reduction at 15 minutes was 2.0 and 1.0 and at 30 minutes was 3.0 and 1.0 for ketamine and placebo, respectively. Improved comfort at 15 and 30 minutes was reported for 75% versus 57% and 61% versus 46% of ketamine and placebo patients, respectively. Sixty-two percent of patients (95% confidence interval 49% to 73%) versus 20% (95% confidence interval 12% to 32%) reported adverse events with ketamine and placebo, respectively. Adverse events were minor, with no patients requiring physical or medical intervention.

Conclusion

Added to nitrous oxide, intranasal ketamine provides clinically significant pain reduction and improved comfort compared with intranasal placebo, with more minor adverse events.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Please see page 242 for the Editor’s Capsule Summary of this article.
 Supervising editor: Steven M. Green, MD. Specific detailed information about possible conflict of interest for individual editors is available at editors.
 Author contributions: GA and EW conceived the study. GA obtained research funding. All authors designed the trial. EW and RS provided statistical expertise on study design. GA, WD, SJ, and GB supervised paramedic training, patient recruitment, and data collection. EW analyzed the data. GA drafted the article, and all authors contributed to its revision and approval. GA takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
 All authors attest to meeting the four ICMJE.org authorship criteria: (1) Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND (2) Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND (3) Final approval of the version to be published; AND (4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. Dr. Andolfatto was supported by a Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute Clinician Scientist Award and a Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute Innovation and Translational Research Award.
 Trial registration number: NCT02753114
 Readers: click on the link to go directly to a survey in which you can provide HTQ9Q2Z to Annals on this particular article.
 A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com.


© 2019  American College of Emergency Physicians. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 74 - N° 2

P. 241-250 - août 2019 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Randomized Trial of Intravenous Lidocaine Versus Hydromorphone for Acute Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department
  • Elliott Chinn, Benjamin W. Friedman, Farnia Naeem, Eddie Irizarry, Freda Afrifa, Eleftheria Zias, Michael P. Jones, Scott Pearlman, Andrew Chertoff, Andrew Wollowitz, E. John Gallagher
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Is the Mallampati Score Useful for Emergency Department Airway Management or Procedural Sedation?
  • Steven M. Green, Mark G. Roback

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.