S'abonner

Evaluation of clinical benefit from treatment with mepolizumab for patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis - 06/06/19

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.11.041 
Jonathan Steinfeld, MD a, Eric S. Bradford, MD b, Judith Brown, PhD c, Stephen Mallett, MSc d, Steven W. Yancey, MSc b, Praveen Akuthota, MD e, Maria C. Cid, MD f, Gerald J. Gleich, MD g, David Jayne, FMedSci h, Paneez Khoury, MD, MHSc i, Carol A. Langford, MD, MHS j, Peter A. Merkel, MD, MPH k, Frank Moosig, MD l, Ulrich Specks, MD m, Peter F. Weller, MD n, Michael E. Wechsler, MD o,
a Respiratory TAU & Flexible Discovery Unit, GlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, Pa 
b Respiratory Therapeutic Area, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC 
c Research and Development, Immuno-Inflammation TAU, Uxbridge, United Kingdom 
d Research & Development, Statistics, Programming and Data Standards, GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park West, Uxbridge, United Kingdom 
e Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, Calif 
f Department of Autoimmune Diseases, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain 
g Departments of Dermatology and Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah 
h Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom 
i Human Eosinophil Section, Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md 
j Department of Rheumatic and Immunologic Diseases, Center for Vasculitis Care and Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 
k Division of Rheumatology, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa 
l Rheumazentrum, Schleswig–Holstein Mitte, Neumünster, Germany 
m Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn 
n Divisions of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass 
o Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colo 

Corresponding author: Michael E. Wechsler, MD, Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, 1400 Jackson St, Denver, CO 80230.Department of MedicineNational Jewish Health1400 Jackson StDenverCO80230

Abstract

Background

In a recent phase III trial (NCT02020889) 53% of mepolizumab-treated versus 19% of placebo-treated patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) achieved protocol-defined remission.

Objective

We sought to investigate post hoc the clinical benefit of mepolizumab in patients with EGPA using a comprehensive definition of benefit encompassing remission, oral glucocorticoid (OGC) dose reduction, and EGPA relapses.

Methods

The randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group trial recruited patients with relapsing/refractory EGPA receiving stable OGCs (prednisolone/prednisone, ≥7.5–50 mg/d) for 4 or more weeks. Patients received 300 mg of subcutaneous mepolizumab or placebo every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. Clinical benefit was defined post hoc as follows: remission at any time (2 definitions used), 50% or greater OGC dose reduction during weeks 48 to 52, or no EGPA relapses. The 2 remission definitions were Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score of 0 plus OGC dose of 4 mg/d or less (remission 1/clinical benefit 1) or 7.5 mg/d or less (remission 2/clinical benefit 2). Clinical benefit was assessed in all patients and among subgroups with a baseline blood eosinophil count of less than 150 cells/μL, baseline OGC dosage of greater than 20 mg/d, or weight of greater than 85 kg.

Results

With mepolizumab versus placebo, 78% versus 32% of patients experienced clinical benefit 1, and 87% versus 53% of patients experienced clinical benefit 2 (both P < .001). Significantly more patients experienced clinical benefit 1 with mepolizumab versus placebo in the blood eosinophil count less than 150 cells/μL subgroup (72% vs 43%, P = .033) and weight greater than 85 kg subgroup (68% vs 23%, P = .005); in the OGC greater than 20 mg/d subgroup, results were not significant but favored mepolizumab (60% vs 36%, P = .395).

Conclusion

When a comprehensive definition of clinical benefit was applied to data from a randomized controlled trial, 78% to 87% of patients with EGPA experienced benefit with mepolizumab.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Graphical abstract




Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, Churg-Strauss syndrome, mepolizumab, eosinophils, IL-5, vasculitis

Abbreviations used : BEC, BVAS, EGPA, EULAR, OGC


Plan


 This study was funded by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK ID 115921 ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02020889), the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID; U01 AI097073) and in part by the Division of Intramural Research, NIH/NIAID. The post hoc analysis of 115921/NCT02020889 presented in this article was funded by GlaxoSmithKline.
 Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: J. Steinfeld, E. S. Bradford, J. Brown, S. Mallett, and S. W. Yancey are employees of GlaxoSmithKline and own stocks in GlaxoSmithKline. P. Akuthota has received research grants from GlaxoSmithKline and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and has acted as a consultant for Ambrx, GlaxoSmithKline, and AstraZeneca. M. C. Cid has acted as a consultant for GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Roche. G. J. Gleich has received research grants from the NIH and has acted as a consultant for Genentech. D. Jayne has received research grants from GlaxoSmithKline and acted as a consultant for GlaxoSmithKline. C. A. Langford has received research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech, ChemoCentryx, and GlaxoSmithKline and is a nonpaid consultant for Bristol-Myers Squibb and Abbvie. P. A. Merkel has received research funds and/or consulting fees from Abbvie, Actelion, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, ChemoCentryx, Genentech/Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, InflaRx, Insmed, Kypha, and TerumoBCT. F. Moosig has received research grants from Roche and has acted as a consultant for Chugai, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, and Roche. P. F. Weller has received research grants from the NIH and acted as a consultant for GlaxoSmithKline. M. E. Wechsler has acted as a consultant for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sentien, Teva, and Vectura and has received research funding from Teva, AstraZeneca, Novartis and Sanofi. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest.


© 2018  GlaxoSmithKline. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 143 - N° 6

P. 2170-2177 - juin 2019 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Psoriatic skin molecular and histopathologic profiles after treatment with risankizumab versus ustekinumab
  • Sudha Visvanathan, Patrick Baum, Richard Vinisko, Ramona Schmid, Mary Flack, Bojan Lalovic, Oliver Kleiner, Judilyn Fuentes-Duculan, Sandra Garcet, Justin W. Davis, Kristie M. Grebe, Jay S. Fine, Steven J. Padula, James G. Krueger
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • IL-21 promotes allergic airway inflammation by driving apoptosis of FoxP3+ regulatory T cells
  • Luigi Tortola, Helga Pawelski, Sanchaita Sriwal Sonar, Franziska Ampenberger, Michael Kurrer, Manfred Kopf

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.