S'abonner

Surfactant Administration in Preterm Infants: Drug Development Opportunities - 24/04/19

Doi : 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.11.041 
Genevieve Taylor, MD 1, * , Wesley Jackson, MD, MPH 1, Christoph P. Hornik, MD, MPH 2, 3, Alec Koss 2, Sreekar Mantena 2, Kenya Homsley 2, Blair Gattis 2, Menefese Kudumu-Clavell 2, Reese Clark, MD 4, P. Brian Smith, MD, MPH, MHS 2, 3, Matthew M. Laughon, MD, MPH 1
1 Department of Pediatrics, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 
2 Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 
3 Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 
4 Pediatrix-Obstetrix Center for Research and Education, Sunrise, FL 

*Reprint requests: Genevieve Taylor, MD, Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, 101 Manning Dr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.Division of Neonatal-Perinatal MedicineDepartment of PediatricsUniversity of North Carolina101 Manning DrChapel HillNC27599

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate how frequently surfactant is used off-label in preterm infants.

Study design

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of prospectively collected administrative data for 2005-2015 from 348 neonatal intensive care units in the US. We quantified off-label administration of poractant alfa, calfactant, or beractant in inborn infants born at <37 weeks of gestational age (GA). Off-label surfactant administration was defined according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) label.

Results

Of a total of 110 822 preterm infants who received surfactant, 68 226 (62%) received the surfactant off-label. The majority of infants who received surfactant off-label had a higher birth weight than those who received surfactant on-label (40 716 [37%]), had an older GA than those who received surfactant on-label (35 191 [32%]), or were treated with intubation and surfactant administration followed by immediate extubation (INSURE) (32 310 [29%]). Poractant alfa was administered via INSURE more frequently than beractant or calfactant (16 688 [38%], 7137 [20%], and 8485 [27%], respectively). An increasing number of infants received surfactant via INSURE from 2005 to 2015 (from 1697 [19%] to 3368 [36%]).

Conclusions

The majority of surfactant given to preterm infants is administered off-label. The uptrend in administration via INSURE coincides with increased supporting evidence. The gap between FDA labeling and current clinic practice exemplifies an opportunity for label expansion, which may require additional prospective or retrospective safety and/or effectiveness data for infants of older GA and higher birth weight.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : surfactant, drug development

Abbreviations : BPD, CPAP, FDA, GA, INSURE, NICU, RDS


Plan


 Supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (Contracts HHSN267200700051C and HHSN275201000003I), the US Food and Drug Administration Office of Orphan Product Development (R01 FD005101), the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R34 HL124038), the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR001117), and the National Institutes of Health (NIH-1R21HD080606-01A1). The sponsors had no role in study design and conduct; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
 Portions of this study were presented at the Pediatric Academic Societies annual meeting, May 6-9, 2017, San Francisco, California.


© 2018  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 208

P. 163-168 - mai 2019 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Discordance in Antenatal Corticosteroid Use and Resuscitation Following Extremely Preterm Birth
  • Matthew A. Rysavy, Edward F. Bell, Jay D. Iams, Waldemar A. Carlo, Lei Li, Brian M. Mercer, Susan R. Hintz, Barbara J. Stoll, Betty R. Vohr, Seetha Shankaran, Michele C. Walsh, Jane E. Brumbaugh, Tarah T. Colaizy, Abhik Das, Rosemary D. Higgins, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Breastfeeding Persistence at 6 Months: Trends and Disparities from 2008 to 2015
  • Anny. H. Xiang, Ting Chow, Janet Mora-Marquez, Mayra P. Martinez, Xinhui Wang, Wei Yu, Mariflor B. Panganiban, Paula M. Richter, Danielle I. Schneider

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.