S'abonner

Antibiotic use in prevention of anal fistulas following incision and drainage of anorectal abscesses: A systematic review and meta-analysis - 16/04/19

Doi : 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.01.015 
Valentin Mocanu a, , Jerry T. Dang a , Farah Ladak a , Chunhong Tian a , Haili Wang a , Daniel W. Birch b , Shahzeer Karmali b
a Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 
b Centre for the Advancement of Minimally Invasive Surgery (CAMIS), Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 

Corresponding author.Department of Surgery, University of Alberta Hospital, 8440 112 Street NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Alberta Hospital8440 112 Street NWEdmontonABT6G 2B7Canada

Abstract

Background

Treatment of anorectal abscesses continues to revolve around early surgical drainage and control of perianal sepsis. Yet even with prompt drainage, abscess recurrence and postoperative fistula formation rates are as high as 40% within 12 months. These complications are thought to be associated with inadequate drainage, elevated bacterial load, or a noncryptoglandular etiology of disease. Postoperative antibiotics have been used to account for these limitations, but their use is controversial and only weakly supported by current guidelines due to low-quality evidences. The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature to determine the role of antibiotics in prevention of anal fistula following incision and drainage of anorectal abscesses.

Methods

Literature search was conducted using Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from 1946 to April 2018. Search terms were “perianal OR anal OR fistula-in-ano OR ischiorectal OR anorectal AND abscess AND antibiotics” and was limited to human studies in the English language. Literature review and data extraction were completed using PRISMA guidelines. A total of six studies with 817 patients were included for systematic review. The weighted mean age was 37.8 years, 20.4% of patients were female, and the follow up ranged from one to 30 months. Antibiotic courses varied by study, and duration ranged from five to 10 days. Of included patients, 358 (43.8%) underwent management without antibiotics while 459 (56.2%) patients were treated with antibiotics. Fistula rate in subjects receiving antibiotics was 16% versus 24% in those not receiving postoperative antibiotics. Meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant protective effect for antibiotic treatment (3 studies, OR 0.64; CI 0.43–0.96; P = 0.03).

Conclusions

Antibiotic therapy following incision and drainage of anorectal abscesses is associated with a 36% lower odds of fistula formation. An empiric 5–10-day course of antibiotics following operative drainage may avoid the morbidity of fistula formation in otherwise healthy patients, although quality of evidence is low. Further randomized trials are needed to fully clarify the role, duration, and type of antibiotics best suited for postoperative prevention of fistula following drainage of anorectal abscesses.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

Antibiotic use following surgical drainage of anorectal abscesses remains controversial.
Fistula rate was 16% versus 24% in those not receiving postoperative antibiotics.
Antibiotics are associated with a 36% lower odds of fistula formation.
Antibiotics may prevent the morbidity of fistula formation in otherwise healthy patients.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2019  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 217 - N° 5

P. 910-917 - mai 2019 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Is bigger better? Twenty-year institutional experience of atypical ductal hyperplasia discovered by core needle biopsy
  • Jessica B. Weiss, Woo S. Do, Dominic M. Forte, Rowan R. Sheldon, Charles K. Childers, Vance Y. Sohn
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • See one, do one, but never teach one? An analysis of resident teaching assist cases under various levels of attending supervision
  • Joshua Smith, Donald Moe, John McClellan, Vance Sohn, William Long, Matthew Martin

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.