To qualitatively and quantitatively compare unenhanced ultra-low-dose chest computed tomography (ULD-CT) acquired at 80kVp and 135kVp.

Fifty-one patients referred for unenhanced chest CT were prospectively included. There were 29 men and 22 women, with a mean age of 64.7±11.6 (SD) years (range: 35–91 years) and a mean body mass index of 26.2±6.3 (SD) (range: 17–54.9). All patients underwent two different ULD-CT protocols (80kVp-40mA and 135kVp-10mA). Image quality of both ULD-CT examinations using a 5-level scale as well as assessability of 6 predetermined lung parenchyma lesions were blindly evaluated by three radiologists and compared using a logistic regression model. Image noise of the two protocols was compared with Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

The mean dose-length product at 80kVp and at 135kVp were 14.7±1.8 (SD) mGy.cm and 15.6±1.9 (SD) mGy.cm, respectively (P<0.001). Image noise was significantly lower at 135kVp (58.9±12.4) than at 80kVp (74.7±14.5) (P<0.001). For all readers and for all examinations, the 135kVp protocol yielded better image quality than 80kVp protocol, with a mean qualitative score of 4.5±0.7 versus 3.9±0.8 (P<0.001). The 135kVp protocol was significantly more often of diagnostic quality than the 80kvp protocol (92.3% versus 77.8%, respectively) (P<0.001) and was less prone to image quality deterioration in obese patients. Parenchymal lesions were never better depicted on the 80kVp protocol than with the 135kVp protocol.

Unenhanced chest ULD-CT should be acquired at a high kilovoltage and low current, such as 135kVp-10mA, over a low kilovoltage and high current protocol.