S'abonner

Risk of radiation-associated intracranial malignancy after stereotactic radiosurgery: a retrospective, multicentre, cohort study - 05/01/19

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30659-4 
Amparo Wolf, PhD a, Kyla Naylor, PhD b, Moses Tam, MD g, Akram Habibi, BSc g, Josef Novotny, PhD c, Roman Liščák, ProfMD c, Nuria Martinez-Moreno, MD d, Roberto Martinez-Alvarez, ProfMD d, Nathaniel Sisterson, MD e, John G Golfinos, ProfMD h, Joshua Silverman, MD g, Hideyuki Kano, MD e, Jason Sheehan, ProfMD f, L Dade Lunsford, ProfMD e, Douglas Kondziolka, ProfMD h,
a Clinical Neurological Sciences, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada 
b Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada 
c Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Roentgenova, Prague, Czech Republic 
d Functional Neurosurgery and Radiosurgery Department, Ruber International Hospital, Madrid, Spain 
e Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA 
f Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA 
g Department of Radiation Oncology, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health System, New York University, New York, NY, USA 
h Department of Neurosurgery, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health System, New York University, New York, NY, USA 

* Correspondence to: Prof Douglas Kondziolka, NYU Langone Health System, New York University, New York 10016, NY, USA NYU Langone Health System New York University New York NY 10016 USA

Summary

Background

A major concern of patients who have stereotactic radiosurgery is the long-term risk of having a secondary intracranial malignancy or, in the case of patients with benign tumours treated with the technique, the risk of malignant transformation. The incidence of stereotactic radiosurgery-associated intracranial malignancy remains unknown; therefore, our aim was to estimate it in a population-based study to assess the long-term safety of this technique.

Methods

We did a population-based, multicentre, cohort study at five international radiosurgery centres (Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic [n=2655 patients]; Ruber International Hospital, Madrid, Spain [n=1080], University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA [n=1027]; University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA [n=80]; and NYU Langone Health System, New York, NY, USA [n=63]). Eligible patients were of any age, and had Gamma Knife radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformation, trigeminal neuralgia, or benign intracranial tumours, which included vestibular or other benign schwannomas, WHO grade 1 meningiomas, pituitary adenomas, and haemangioblastoma. Patients were excluded if they had previously had radiotherapy or did not have a minimum follow-up time of 5 years. The primary objective of the study was to estimate the incidence of stereotactic radiosurgery-associated intracranial malignancy, including malignant transformation of a benign lesion or development of radiation-associated secondary intracranial cancer, defined as within the 2 Gy isodose line. Estimates of age-adjusted incidence of primary CNS malignancies in the USA and European countries were retrieved from the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Global Cancer statistics.

Findings

Of 14 168 patients who had Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery between Aug 14, 1987, and Dec 31, 2011, in the five contributing centres, 4905 patients were eligible for the analysis (had a minimum follow-up of 5 years and no history of previous radiation therapy). Diagnostic entities included vestibular schwannomas (1011 [20·6%] of 4905 patients), meningiomas (1490 [30·4%]), arteriovenous malformations (1089 [22·2%]), trigeminal neuralgia (565 [11·5%]), pituitary adenomas (641 [13·1%]), haemangioblastoma (29 [0·6%]), and other schwannomas (80 [1·6%]). With a median follow-up of 8·1 years (IQR 6·0–10·6), two (0·06%) of 3251 patients with benign tumours were diagnosed with suspected malignant transformation and one (0·02%) of 4905 patients was considered a case of radiosurgery-associated intracranial malignancy, resulting in an incidence of 6·87 per 100 000 patient-years (95% CI 1·15–22·71) for malignant transformation and 2·26 per 100 000 patient-years (0·11–11·17) for radiosurgery-associated intracranial malignancy. Two (0·04%) of 4905 patients developed intracranial malignancies, which were judged unrelated to the radiation field. Overall incidence of radiosurgery-associated malignancy was 6·80 per 100 000 patients-years (95% CI 1·73–18·50), or a cumulative incidence of 0·045% (95% CI 0·00–0·34) over 10 years. The overall incidence of 6·8 per 100 000, which includes institutions from Europe and the USA, after stereotactic radiosurgery was found to be similar to the risk of developing a malignant CNS tumour in the general population of the USA and some European countries as estimated by the CBTRUS and IARC data, respectively.

Interpretation

These data show that the estimated risk of an intracranial secondary malignancy or malignant transformation of a benign tumour in patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery remains low at long-term follow-up, and is similar to the risk of the general population to have a primary CNS tumour. Although prospective cohort studies with longer follow-up are warranted to support the results of this study, the available evidence suggests the long-term safety of stereotactic radiosurgery and could support physicians counselling patients on Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery.

Funding

None.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2019  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 20 - N° 1

P. 159-164 - janvier 2019 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Prevalence of human papillomavirus DNA and p16INK4a in penile cancer and penile intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Tina Bech Olesen, Freja Lærke Sand, Christina Louise Rasmussen, Vanna Albieri, Birgitte Grønkær Toft, Bodil Norrild, Christian Munk, Susanne Krüger Kjær
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Exploring and comparing adverse events between PARP inhibitors
  • Christopher J LaFargue, Graziela Z Dal Molin, Anil K Sood, Robert L Coleman

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.