S'abonner

Genomically annotated risk model for advanced renal-cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study - 19/12/18

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30648-X 
Martin H Voss, MD a, , Albert Reising, MS b, Yuan Cheng, PhD b, Parul Patel, MS b, Mahtab Marker, PhD b, Fengshen Kuo, PhD a, Timothy A Chan, MD a, Toni K Choueiri, MD c, James J Hsieh, MD d, A Ari Hakimi, MD a, Robert J Motzer, MD a
a Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA 
b Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA 
c Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA 
d Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA 

* Correspondence to: Dr Martin H Voss, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY 10065 USA

Summary

Background

The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) risk model is an established prognostic tool for metastatic renal-cell carcinoma that integrates clinical and laboratory data, but is agnostic to tumour genomics. Several mutations, including BAP1 and PBRM1, have prognostic value in renal-cell carcinoma. Using two independent clinical trial datasets of patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma, we aimed to study whether the addition of the mutation status for several candidate prognostic genes to the MSKCC model could improve the model’s prognostic performance.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we used available formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour tissue and clinical outcome data from patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma assigned to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the COMPARZ trial (training cohort; n=357) and RECORD-3 trial (validation cohort; n=258). Eligible patients in both trials were treatment-naive; had histologically confirmed, advanced, or metastatic renal-cell carcinoma; and a Karnofsky performance status score of at least 70. For each cohort, data from patients in all treatment groups (sunitinib and pazopanib in the training cohort, and everolimus and sunitinib in the validation cohort) were pooled for this analysis. In the training cohort, tumour tissue was used to evaluate somatic mutations by next-generation sequencing, and the association between cancer-specific outcomes (overall survival, progression-free survival, and overall response) and the mutation status of six genes of interest (BAP1, PBRM1, TP53, TERT, KDM5C, and SETD2) was tested. Only those genes with prognostic value in this setting were added to the MSKCC risk model to create a genomically annotated version. The validation cohort was used to independently test the prognostic value of the annotated model compared with the original MSKCC risk model.

Findings

357 (32%) of 1110 patients assigned to protocol treatment in the COMPARZ study between August, 2008, and September, 2011, were evaluable for mutation status and clinical outcomes in the training cohort. The independent validation cohort included 258 (55%) of 471 evaluable patients, enrolled between October, 2009, and June, 2011, on the RECORD-3 study. In the training cohort, the presence of any mutation in BAP1 or TP53, or both, and absence of any mutation in PBRM1 were prognostic in terms of overall survival (TP53wt/BAP1mut, TP53mut/BAP1wt o TP53mut/BAP1mut vs TP53wt/BAP1wt hazard ratio [HR] 1·57, 95% CI 1·21–2·04; p=0·0008; PBRM1wt vs PBRMmut, HR 1·58, 1·16–2·14; p=0·0035). The mutation status for these three prognostic genes were added to the original MSKCC risk model to create a genomically annotated version. Distribution of participants in the training cohort into the three risk groups of the original MSKCC model changed from 87 (24%) of 357 patients deemed at favourable risk, 217 (61%) at intermediate risk, and 53 (15%) at poor risk, to distribution across four risk groups in the genomically annotated risk model, with 36 (10%) of 357 deemed at favourable risk, 77 (22%) at good risk, 108 (30%) at intermediate risk, and 136 (38%) at poor risk. Addition of genomic information improved model performance for predicting overall survival (C-index: original model, 0·595 [95% CI 0·557–0·634] vs new model, 0·637 [0·595–0·679]) and progression-free survival (0·567 [95% CI 0·529–0·604] vs 0·602 [0·560–0·643]) with adequate discrimination of the proportion of patients who achieved an objective response (Cochran-Armitage one-sided p=0·0014). Analyses in the validation cohort confirmed the superiority of the genomically annotated risk model over the original version.

Interpretation

The mutation status of BAP1, PBRM1, and TP53 has independent prognostic value in patients with advanced or metastatic renal-cell carcinoma treated with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Improved stratification of patients across risk groups by use of a genomically annotated model including the mutational status of these three genes warrants further investigation in prospective trials and could be of use as a model to stratify patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma in clinical trials.

Funding

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, MSKCC Support Grant/Core Grant, and the J Randall & Kathleen L MacDonald Research Fund.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2018  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 19 - N° 12

P. 1688-1698 - décembre 2018 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus debulking surgery in advanced tubo-ovarian cancers: pooled analysis of individual patient data from the EORTC 55971 and CHORUS trials
  • Ignace Vergote, Corneel Coens, Matthew Nankivell, Gunnar B Kristensen, Mahesh K B Parmar, Tom Ehlen, Gordon C Jayson, Nick Johnson, Ann Marie Swart, René Verheijen, W Glenn McCluggage, Tim Perren, Pierluigi Benedetti Panici, Gemma Kenter, Antonio Casado, Cesar Mendiola, Gavin Stuart, Nick S Reed, Sean Kehoe, EORTC, MRC CHORUS study investigators, Claes Tropé G., Stephen Dobbs, Sharadah Essapen, P. Hoskins, John Green, E. Gilby, M. Van Baal, Jeremy Twigg, Maria E.L. Van Der Burg, Keith Godfrey, Angel J. Lacave, R. Angioli, Rahul Nath, Kirk Chin, Charles Redman, R. Lotocki, Adeola Olaitan, B. Mosgaard, G. Rustin, Thomas Ind, Mojca Persic, Martin Hogg, J. Van Der Velden, J. Ledermann, Peter Sykes Peter Sykes, Krishnawam Madhavan, P. Kannisto, Vicky Hird, A. Evans, R. Sandvei R., P. Gauthier, D.J. Cruickshank, P.B. Ottevanger, Sheila Pearson, Henry Kitchener, Marcia Hall, P. Bessette, S. Pecorelli, E. Gerdin, Tito Lopes, Andrew Fish, Clare Barlow., K. Van Eygen, A. Floquet, B. Tholander, N. Gul, Robert Gornall, David Luesley, Philip Kirwan, Paul Symonds, Richard Henry, David Poole, Ian McNeish, Mark Hocking, Al Sammaraie, P. Speiser, E. Leblanc, J.A. Green, C.F. De Oliveira, R. Grimshaw, P. Zola, David Parkin, David Luesley, Martin Lamb, Anne Hong, Alan Gillespie, Abdel Hamid, Ahmed Ahmed, M. Plante, B. De Valk, A. Nordin, Andrew Clamp, David Perez, Graham Dark Graham Dark, Michelle Ferguson, Carol MacGregor, Geraldine Skailes, Rachel Jones, Alan Gillespie, G. Cawdell, Simon Leeson, L. Elit, C. Dittrich, W. Gotlieb, David Poole, John Cullimore, Barbara Crosse, Paul Ridley, Anthony Head, Joaquin Nieto, Saif Awwad, Dirk Brinkmann, Damian Eustace, Andrew Hindley, D. Katsaros, C. Popadiuk, Tome Kristeller, C. Redman, S. Chan, C. Marth, Dennis Yiannakis, Kate Lankaster, Gareth Beynon, Anwar Suhail, Fernando Indrajit, Anne Hong, Mary Quigley, Olu Adeyemi, Mojca Persic, Fiona Lofts, Orla McNally, Amanda Tristam, Martin Lee, R. Counsell, N. Gleeson, A. Papadopoulos, T. Maggino, A. Honkoop, P. Ghatage, J.B. Vermorken, J. De Greve, K. Boman, E Petru, F. Amant
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Molecular biomarkers in bladder preservation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer
  • David T Miyamoto, Kent W Mouw, Felix Y Feng, William U Shipley, Jason A Efstathiou

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.