S'abonner

International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches–Chronic Kidney Disease (ISCHEMIA-CKD): Rationale and design - 17/12/18

Doi : 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.07.023 
Sripal Bangalore, MD, MHA a, , David J. Maron, MD b, Jerome L. Fleg, MD c, Sean M. O’Brien, MD d, Charles A. Herzog, MD e, Gregg W. Stone, MD f, Daniel B. Mark, MD, MPH d, John A. Spertus, MD, MPH g, Karen P. Alexander, MD d, Mandeep S. Sidhu, MD h, Glenn M. Chertow, MD b, William E. Boden, MD i, Judith S. Hochman, MD a

on behalf of the ISCHEMIA-CKD Research Group

a New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 
b Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 
c National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD 
d Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC 
e Hennepin County Medical Center and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 
f New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY 
g Mid-America Heart Institute/University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 
h Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY 
i Veterans Affairs New England Healthcare System, Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology, Research, and Informatics Center, Boston, MA 

Reprint requests: Sripal Bangalore, MD, MHA, Professor of Medicine, Director, Complex Coronary Intervention, Bellevue, Director of Research, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Director, Cardiovascular Outcomes Group, Cardiovascular Clinical Research Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016.New York University School of MedicineNew YorkNY10016

Résumé

Background

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and stable ischemic heart disease are at markedly increased risk of cardiovascular events. Prior trials comparing a strategy of optimal medical therapy (OMT) with or without revascularization have largely excluded patients with advanced CKD. Whether a routine invasive approach when compared with a conservative strategy is beneficial in such patients is unknown.

Methods

ISCHEMIA-CKD is a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute–funded randomized trial designed to determine the comparative effectiveness of an initial invasive strategy (cardiac catheterization and optimal revascularization [percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery, if suitable] plus OMT) versus a conservative strategy (OMT alone, with cardiac catheterization and revascularization [percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery, if suitable] reserved for failure of OMT) on long-term clinical outcomes in 777 patients with advanced CKD (defined as those with estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73m2 or on dialysis) and moderate or severe ischemia on stress testing. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to the invasive or a conservative strategy. The primary end point is a composite of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. Major secondary endpoints are a composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, hospitalization for heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest; angina control; and disease-specific quality of life. Safety outcomes such as initiation of maintenance dialysis and a composite of initiation of maintenance dialysis or death will be reported. The trial is projected to have 80% power to detect a 22% to 24% reduction in the primary composite end point with the invasive strategy when compared with the conservative strategy.

Conclusions

ISCHEMIA-CKD will determine whether an initial invasive management strategy improves clinical outcomes when added to OMT in patients with advanced CKD and stable ischemic heart disease.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Michelle O'Shaughnessy, MD, served as guest editor for this article.
 RCT# NCT01985360.
 Funding source: The study was funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01HL117904, U01HL117905).
 Disclaimer: The content of this manuscript is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the views of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; the National Institutes of Health; or the United States Department of Health and Human Services.


© 2018  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 205

P. 42-52 - novembre 2018 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip in Patients with Heart Failure and Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: Design and rationale of the COAPT trial
  • Michael J. Mack, William T. Abraham, JoAnn Lindenfeld, Steven F. Bolling, Ted E. Feldman, Paul A. Grayburn, Samir R. Kapadia, Patrick M. McCarthy, D. Scott Lim, James E. Udelson, Michael R. Zile, James S. Gammie, A. Marc Gillinov, Donald D. Glower, David A. Heimansohn, Rakesh M. Suri, Jeffrey T. Ellis, Yu Shu, Saibal Kar, Neil J. Weissman, Gregg W. Stone
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Edoxaban Versus standard of care and their effects on clinical outcomes in patients having undergone Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Atrial Fibrillation—Rationale and design of the ENVISAGE-TAVI AF trial
  • Nicolas M. Van Mieghem, Martin Unverdorben, Marco Valgimigli, Roxana Mehran, Eric Boersma, Usman Baber, Christian Hengstenberg, Minggao Shi, Cathy Chen, Shigeru Saito, Roland Veltkamp, Pascal Vranckx, George D. Dangas

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.