S'abonner

A study of the visual symptoms in two-dimensional versus three-dimensional laparoscopy - 06/12/18

Doi : 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.07.051 
Michael El Boghdady , Gobinath Ramakrishnan, Afshin Alijani
 Dundee Institute for Healthcare Simulation, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, UK 

Corresponding author. Dundee Institute for Healthcare Simulation, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK.Dundee Institute for Healthcare SimulationNinewells Hospital and Medical SchoolUniversity of DundeeDundeeDD1 9SYUK

Abstract

Aim

There are reports of visual strains and associated symptoms when operating in a 3D laparoscopic environment. We aimed to study the extent of visual symptoms seen in 3D versus conventional 2D imaging in volunteers performing laparoscopic tasks and study the effect of eye exercises on 3D laparoscopy.

Methods

Twenty four consented laparoscopic novices were required to undergo a visual acuity test (Snellen chart) and eye deviation test (Maddox Wing). A battery of specific isolated laparoscopic tasks lasting 30 min was developed to test their ability to detect changes in 2D and 3D environments separately. Before and after the 2D and 3D laparoscopic tasks, subjects were asked to complete a standardised questionnaire designed to scale (from 0 to 10) their visual symptoms (blurred vision, difficulty in refocusing from one distance to another, irritated or burning eyes, dry eyes, eyestrain, headache and dizziness). Participants who underwent 3D laparoscopic tasks were randomized into two groups, those who received two minutes eye exercises before performing the tasks and those who didn't. Independent t-test was used for the statistical analysis of this study.

Results

Visual symptoms and eye strain were significant in 2D (p < 0.01) and difficulty in refocusing from one distance to another was significant in 3D laparoscopic imaging (p < 0.05). There was no significant effect of the simple eye exercises on relieving the visual symptoms in the 3D group.

Conclusion

Visual symptoms were present in both 2D and 3D imaging laparoscopy. Eye strain was prominent in 2D imaging, while difficulty in refocusing from one distance to another was prominent in 3D. Eye exercises for 3D visual symptoms did not bring any significant improvement.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

There is strong evidence to suggest that 3 dimensional (3D) imaging improves the task performance during laparoscopic surgery.
This improved performance comes at a price of increased eye strain for a subgroup of surgeons.
Our study showed that visual symptoms were present in both 2D and 3D imaging laparoscopy.
Eye strain was prominent in 2D imaging, and difficulty in refocusing from one distance to another was prominent in 3D.
Eye exercises before the 3D laparoscopic tasks did not resolve the 3D visual symptoms.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Surgery, Laparoscopy, Three-dimensional, Two-dimensional, Visual symptoms, Eye exercise, Visual acuity, Visual analogue, Eye deviation


Plan


Crown Copyright © 2018  Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 216 - N° 6

P. 1114-1117 - décembre 2018 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Sarcopenia predicts poor outcomes in urgent exploratory laparotomy
  • Lisa M. Francomacaro, Charles Walker, Kathryn Jaap, James Dove, Marie Hunsinger, Kenneth Widom, Denise Torres, Mohsen Shabahang, Joseph Blansfield, Jeffrey Wild
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • The role of sex in the outcomes of patients with biliary tract cancers remains unclear: A population-based study
  • Madeline Lemke, Yvonne DeWit, Sulaiman Nanji, Christopher M. Booth, Jennifer A. Flemming

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.