S'abonner

Feasibility and accuracy of speckle tracking echocardiography in emergency department patients - 24/11/18

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.08.074 
Lindsay Reardon a, , 1 , William J. Scheels a, 2 , Adam J. Singer b , Robert F. Reardon a
a Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America 
b Department of Emergency Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States of America 

Corresponding author at: Department of Emergency Medicine, HSC L4-080, 8350 SUNY, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8350, United States of America.Department of Emergency MedicineHSC L4-0808350 SUNYStony BrookNY11794-8350United States of America

Abstract

Background

Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) is a novel technology that measures regional wall-motion abnormalities that may speed diagnosis and intervention of acute coronary occlusion in Emergency Department (ED) patients with non-ST elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS). STE provides an objective measurement of myocardial strain that is superior to visual assessment of wall motion when performed as part of a point-of-care (POC) echocardiogram. We determined the feasibility and preliminary accuracy of POC STE operated by emergency providers when compared to comprehensive echocardiography or final diagnosis of ACS.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 187 emergency provider POC echocardiograms with STE from 7/2014–5/2016 for suspected ACS at a large academic trauma center. Feasibility of POC STE was determined by calculating the percentage of complete exams (adequate apical 4-chamber and parasternal short axis views) out of all STE exams. We then used two different criterion standards for calculating diagnostic accuracy of STE: comprehensive echocardiograms with wall motion abnormalities or formal diagnosis of ACS based on elevated cardiac troponins, unstable angina, percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery stenosis >70% on catheterization.

Results

Of 187 STE studies performed, 75 (40%) were considered complete. Ultrasound-experienced providers had higher rates of complete exams (65% vs. 35%, P = 0.01). 16 of 75 exams (21%) were positive for myocardial strain, and of these 16 (100%) were admitted, 12 (75%) had positive troponins, 6 (46%) had positive comprehensive echocardiograms, and 3 (19%) had PCI or >70% stenotic lesion on catheterization. Compared with comprehensive echocardiography, POC STE had 35% sensitivity, 70% specificity, 46% positive predictive value (PPV), and 59% negative predictive value (NPV). Compared with formal diagnosis of ACS, POC STE had 29% sensitivity, 88% specificity, 75% positive predictive value (PPV), and 51% negative predictive value (NPV).

Conclusion

STE is a potentially feasible adjunct to standard bedside echocardiography in ED patients with suspected ACS when operated by experienced ultrasound-trained physicians in the ED. This data shows STE performed by emergency providers is not yet sensitive enough alone to diagnose ACS, and has low accuracy when compared to comprehensive echocardiography. However, the PPV and specificity improve when performed by expert ultrasound-trained providers. STE should be considered for inclusion in the Emergency Ultrasound Fellowship curriculum.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Point-of-care ultrasound, Echocardiography, Emergency ultrasound, Speckle tracking echocardiography, Strain echocardiography


Plan


 Sources of support: There were no funding sources for this study.
☆☆ LR, WJS, AJS and RFR report no conflicts of interest and have no disclosures.
 Presentations: SAEM18, Indianapolis, May 17, 2018.


© 2018  Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 36 - N° 12

P. 2254-2259 - décembre 2018 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Air pollutants and atmospheric pressure increased risk of ED visit for spontaneous pneumothorax
  • Joo Hyung Park, Sun Hwa Lee, Seong Jong Yun, Seokyong Ryu, Seung Woon Choi, Hye Jin Kim, Tae Kyung Kang, Sung Chan Oh, Suk Jin Cho
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Surfactant for the management of pediatric hydrocarbon ingestion
  • Christopher Sommer, Adam B. Johnson, G. Sam Wang, Kevin Poel

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.