S'abonner

Opportunities and priorities for breast surgical research - 03/10/18

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30511-4 
Ramsey I Cutress, ProfPhD a, * , Stuart A McIntosh, PhD b, *, Shelley Potter, PhD c, d, *, Amit Goyal, MD e, Cliona C Kirwan, PhD f, g, James Harvey, PhD f, g, Adele Francis, ProfPhD h, Amtul R Carmichael, ProfMD i, j, Raghavan Vidya, MD k, Jayant S Vaidya, ProfPhD l, Patricia Fairbrother m, John R Benson, ProfMD n, o, Malcolm W R Reed, ProfMD p
on behalf of the

Association of Breast Surgery Surgical Gap Analysis Working Group

  Collaborators listed at the end of the Review
Narendra N Basu, John R Benson, Nigel J Bundred, Amtul R Carmichael, Nathan Coombs, Ramsey I Cutress, John Dickson, J Michael Dixon, Michael Douek, Patricia Fairbrother, Adele Francis, Amit Goyal, Diana Harcourt, James Harvey, Chris Holcombe, Jonathan Horsnell, Fahad M Iqbal, Lucy R Khan, Cliona C Kirwan, Daniel R Leff, Anthony J Maxwell, Stuart A McIntosh, Nicole Paraskeva, Shelley Potter, Tim Rattay, Malcolm WR Reed, Amtul S Sami, Julian Singer, Edward R St John, Ash Subramanian, Jeffrey S Tobias, Nader Touqan, Jayant S Vaidya, Raghavan Vidya, Zoe E Winters

a Faculty of Medicine and Breast Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, UK 
b Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast 
c Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK 
d Bristol Breast Care Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK 
e Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK 
f Division of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK 
g Nightingale Breast Unit, University Hospital of South Manchester, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK 
h University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK 
i Queens Hospital, Burton-on-Trent, UK 
j University of Aston, Birmingham, UK 
k New Cross Hospital, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK 
l Surgical Interventional Trials Unit, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London 
m Independent Cancer Patients’ Voice, London, UK 
n Cambridge Breast Unit, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK 
o School of Medicine, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK 
p Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK 

* Correspondence to: Ramsey Cutress, Somers Cancer Research Building, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK Somers Cancer Research Building Southampton General Hospital Southampton SO16 6YD UK

Summary

The 2013 Breast Cancer Campaign gap analysis established breast cancer research priorities without a specific focus on surgical research or the role of surgeons on breast cancer research. This Review aims to identify opportunities and priorities for research in breast surgery to complement the 2013 gap analysis. To identify these goals, research-active breast surgeons met and identified areas for breast surgery research that mapped to the patient pathway. Areas included diagnosis, neoadjuvant treatment, surgery, adjuvant therapy, and attention to special groups (eg, those receiving risk-reducing surgery). Section leads were identified based on research interests, with invited input from experts in specific areas, supported by consultation with members of the Association of Breast Surgery and Independent Cancer Patients’ Voice groups. The document was iteratively modified until participants were satisfied that key priorities for surgical research were clear. Key research gaps included issues surrounding overdiagnosis and treatment; optimising treatment options and their selection for neoadjuvant therapies and subsequent surgery; reducing rates of re-operations for breast-conserving surgery; generating evidence for clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of breast reconstruction, and mechanisms for assessing novel interventions; establishing optimal axillary management, especially post-neoadjuvant treatment; and defining and standardising indications for risk-reducing surgery. We propose strategies for resolving these knowledge gaps. Surgeons are ideally placed for a central role in breast cancer research and should foster a culture of engagement and participation in research to benefit patients and health-care systems. Development of infrastructure and surgical research capacity, together with appropriate allocation of research funding, is needed to successfully address the key clinical and translational research gaps that are highlighted in this Review within the next two decades.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2018  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 19 - N° 10

P. e521-e533 - octobre 2018 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Effect of apalutamide on health-related quality of life in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: an analysis of the SPARTAN randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial
  • Fred Saad, David Cella, Ethan Basch, Boris A Hadaschik, Paul N Mainwaring, Stéphane Oudard, Julie N Graff, Kelly McQuarrie, Susan Li, Stacie Hudgens, Joe Lawson, Angela Lopez-Gitlitz, Margaret K Yu, Matthew R Smith, Eric J Small
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Use of modern imaging methods to facilitate trials of metastasis-directed therapy for oligometastatic disease in prostate cancer: a consensus recommendation from the EORTC Imaging Group
  • Frédéric E Lecouvet, Daniela E Oprea-Lager, Yan Liu, Piet Ost, Luc Bidaut, Laurence Collette, Christophe M Deroose, Karolien Goffin, Ken Herrmann, Otto S Hoekstra, Gem Kramer, Yolande Lievens, Egesta Lopci, David Pasquier, Lars J Petersen, Jean-Noël Talbot, Helle Zacho, Bertrand Tombal, Nandita M deSouza

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.