Hospital readmissions among patients with skin disease: A retrospective cohort study - 19/09/18
Abstract |
Background |
Hospital readmissions represent a potential target for reducing unnecessary health care expenditures; however, readmissions following dermatology hospitalizations remain poorly characterized.
Objective |
To assess the frequency and demographics of readmissions for skin disease.
Methods |
We performed a retrospective cohort study of dermatology hospitalizations by using the 2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database.
Results |
Readmissions following dermatologic hospitalizations cost the American health care system $1.05 billion in 2014. The 30-day rate of all-cause readmission following the 647,251 weighted index admissions for skin disease was 12.63%. Readmission was most common following hospitalizations for cutaneous lymphomas (39.63%), connective tissue disorders (26.28%), and cutaneous congenital abnormalities (23.86%). Predictors of readmission included public insurance with Medicaid (odds ratio [OR], 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.53-1.70) or Medicare (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.48-1.62), residence in a low-income community (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.09-1.20), an increased number of chronic conditions (OR, 4.46; 95% CI, 4.15-4.79), and a large hospital (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-1.16). Urban (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87-0.94) and rural (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.73-0.82) nonteaching hospitals were protective against readmissions from skin disease.
Limitations |
We were unable to assess the impact of inpatient dermatology consultations on hospital readmission rates.
Conclusions |
There are significant health care and demographic disparities in readmissions for skin disease.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : dermatology hospitalizations, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, health care expenditures, hospital readmissions, inpatient dermatology, Nationwide Readmission Database
Abbreviations used : CI, HRRP, NRD, OR
Plan
Mr Arnold and Ms Crockett are cofirst authors. |
|
Funding sources: None. |
|
Conflicts of interest: None disclosed. |
|
Reprints not available from the authors. |
Vol 79 - N° 4
P. 696-701 - octobre 2018 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?