Differences in Prehospital Patient Assessments for Pediatric Versus Adult Patients - 25/07/18
, Jonathan Elmer, MD, MS 2, 3, Jeremiah Escajeda, MD 2, Christian Martin-Gill, MD, MPH 2Abstract |
Objective |
To evaluate whether completion of vital signs assessments in pediatric transports by emergency medical services (EMS) differs by patient age.
Study design |
We reviewed records by 20 agencies in a regional EMS system in Southwestern Pennsylvania between April 1, 2013 and December 31, 2016. We abstracted demographics, vital signs (systolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate), clinical, and transport characteristics. We categorized age as neonates (≤30 days), infants (1 month to <1 year), toddler (1 to <2 years), early childhood (2 to <6 years), middle childhood (6 to <12 years), adolescent (12 to <18 years), and adult (≥18 years). We used unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression to test if age group was associated with vital signs documentation, reporting of Glasgow Coma Scale and pain scale after trauma, and recording of oxygen saturation and breath sounds in respiratory complaints, using adults as the reference group.
Results |
In total, 371 746 cases (21 883 pediatric, 5.9%) were included. In adjusted analysis, most pediatric categories had reduced odds of complete vitals documentation (percent, OR, 95% CI): neonates (49.6%, 0.02, 0.02-0.03), infants (68.2%, 0.04, 0.03-0.04), toddlers (78.1%, 0.07, 0.06-0.07), early childhood (87.4%, 0.13, 0.12-0.15), and middle childhood (95.3%, 0.54, 0.46-0.63). Pain score documentation was lower in children after trauma (OR 0.80, 95%CI 0.76-0.85), and oxygen saturation documentation was lower in children with respiratory complaints (OR 0.20, 95%CI 0.18-0.25).
Conclusions |
Pediatric patients were at increased risk of lacking vital signs documentation during prehospital care. This represents a critical area for education and quality improvement.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : prehospital medicine, emergency medical services
Abbreviations : EMS, GCS, NEMSIS
Plan
| J.E. receives research support from the National Institutes of Health (1K23NS097629). The other authors declare no conflicts of interest. |
Vol 199
P. 200 - août 2018 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
