S'abonner

Resource utilization and outcome among patients with selective versus nonselective troponin testing - 12/05/18

Doi : 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.01.010 
Alex R. Campbell, MD a, Alexander J. Rodriguez, BS a, David M. Larson, MD a, Craig E. Strauss, MD a, Ross F. Garberich, MS a, Matthew F. Partridge, BA a, Timothy D. Henry, MD b, Scott W. Sharkey, MD a,
a Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation at Abbott Northwestern Hospital, 800 E 28th St. Minneapolis, MN 
b Advanced Health Sciences Pavilion, Suite A3600 127 S. San Vicente Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 

Reprint request: Scott W. Sharkey, MD, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, 920 East 28th Street, Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN 55408.Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation920 East 28th Street, Suite 300MinneapolisMN55408

Abstract

Objective

In patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS), troponin testing is effective for diagnosis and prognosis. Troponin testing has now expanded to include patients without suspected ACS. This nonselective troponin testing has unknown consequences for resource utilization and outcome. Therefore, we examined selective versus nonselective troponin testing with respect to patient characteristics, resource utilization, and outcome.

Methods

This retrospective 1-year study included all patients with troponin testing at a U.S. emergency department. Testing was classified as selective (ACS) or nonselective (non-ACS) based on admission ICD-9 codes. Troponin upper reference limit (URL) was ≥99th percentile.

Results

Among 47,053 patients, troponin was measured in 9109 (19%) of whom 5764 were hospitalized. Admission diagnosis was non-ACS in 4427 (77%) and ACS in 1337 (23%). Non-ACS patients were older, 71±17 versus 65±16 years, with longer hospital stay, 77 versus 32 h, and greater 1-year mortality 22% versus 6.7%; P<.001. In patients with troponin ≥URL, revascularization was performed in 64 (4.7%) of non-ACS versus 213 (48%) of ACS; P<.001. In patients with troponin <URL, 1-year mortality was 16% in non-ACS versus 3.5% in ACS; P<.001. In those with troponin ≥URL, 1-year mortality was 35% in non-ACS versus 13% in ACS; P<.001. Death was non-cardiac in >80% of the non-ACS population

Conclusions

Contemporary troponin testing is frequently nonselective. The non-ACS and ACS populations differ significantly regarding clinical characteristics, revascularization rates, and outcomes. Troponin elevation is a powerful predictor of 1-year mortality in non-ACS, this association reveals an opportunity for risk stratification and targeted therapy.

Key Questions

In patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS), troponin testing is effective for diagnosis and prognosis. However, troponin testing has now expanded to include patients without suspected ACS. This nonselective troponin testing has unknown consequences for hospital resource utilization and patient outcome.

Our findings demonstrate contemporary troponin testing is largely nonselective (77% of testing was performed in patients without acute coronary syndrome). In comparison to patients with acute coronary syndrome, those with non-acute coronary syndrome are older, with longer hospital stay, lower revascularization rates, and greater 1-year mortality. Troponin elevation identifies a high-risk population in both acute coronary syndrome and non-acute coronary syndrome populations, yet effective treatment for the latter is lacking.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Funding: Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation.
 Conflict of Interest: None declared.
 Acknowledgments: None.


© 2018  Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 199

P. 68-74 - mai 2018 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale following cryptogenic stroke: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
  • Haris Riaz, Muhammad Shahzeb Khan, Aldo L. Schenone, Anam A. Waheed, Arooj Razzak Khan, Richard A. Krasuski
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Trends and outcomes of cardiac transplantation from donors dying of drug intoxication
  • Haider J. Warraich, Di Lu, Stacy Cobb, Lauren B. Cooper, Adam DeVore, Chetan B. Patel, Paul B. Rosenberg, Jacob N. Schroder, Mani A. Daneshmand, Carmelo A. Milano, Adrian F. Hernandez, Joseph G. Rogers, Robert J. Mentz

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.