S'abonner

Telemedicine cardiovascular risk reduction in veterans: The CITIES trial - 12/05/18

Doi : 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.02.002 
Hayden B. Bosworth, PhD a, b, e, f, , Maren K. Olsen, PhD a, d, Felicia McCant, MSSW a, Karen M. Stechuchak, MS a, Susanne Danus, BS a, Matthew J. Crowley, MD, MHS a, Karen M. Goldstein, MD, MSPH a, c, Leah L. Zullig, PhD, MPH a, b, Eugene Z. Oddone, MD a, e
a Health Services Research in Primary Care, Center of Innovation, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC 
b Center for Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC 
c Ambulatory Care Services, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC 
d Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 
e Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC 
f Departments of Psychiatry and School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC 

Reprint requests: Hayden B. Bosworth, PhD, Health Service Research in Primary Care, Center of Innovation, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 411 W Chapel Hill St, Suite 600, Durham, NC 27701.Health Service Research in Primary Care, Center of Innovation, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center411 W Chapel Hill St, Suite 600DurhamNC27701

Abstract

Background

Comprehensive programs addressing tailored patient self-management and pharmacotherapy may reduce barriers to cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduction.

Methods

This is a 2-arm (clinical pharmacist specialist–delivered, telehealth intervention and education control) randomized controlled trial including Veterans with poorly controlled hypertension and/or hypercholesterolemia. Primary outcome was Framingham CVD risk score at 6 and 12 months, with systolic blood pressure; diastolic blood pressure; total cholesterol; low-density lipoprotein; high-density lipoprotein; body mass index; and, for those with diabetes, HbA1c as secondary outcomes.

Results

Among 428 Veterans, 50% were African American, 85% were men, and 33% had limited health literacy. Relative to the education control group, the clinical pharmacist specialist–delivered intervention did not show a reduction in CVD risk score at 6 months (−1.8, 95% CI −3.9 to 0.3; P = .10) or 12 months (−0.3, 95% CI −2.4 to 1.7; P = .74). No differences were seen in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, or low-density lipoprotein at 6 or 12 months. We did observe a significant decline in total cholesterol at 6 months (−7.0, 95% CI −13.4 to −0.6; P = .03) in the intervention relative to education control group. Among patients in the intervention group, 34% received at least 5 of the 12 planned intervention calls and were considered “compliers.” A sensitivity analysis of the “complier average causal effect” of intervention compared to control showed a mean difference in CVD risk score reduction of 5.7 (95% CI −12.0 to 0.7) at 6 months and −1.7 (95% CI −7.6 to 4.8) at 12 months.

Conclusions

Despite increased access to pharmacist resources, we did not observe significant improvements in CVD risk for patients randomized to the intervention compared to education control over 12 months. However, the intervention may have positive impact among those who actively participate, particularly in the short term.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Jeffrey S. Berger, MD, MS, served as guest editor for this article.
 Clinical Trials Registration: NCT0114208.
 Disclaimers: The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs, the United States government, or Duke University.


© 2018  Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 199

P. 122-129 - mai 2018 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Effects of a 12-week mHealth program on peak VO2 and physical activity patterns after completing cardiac rehabilitation: A randomized controlled trial
  • Brian D. Duscha, Lucy W. Piner, Mahesh P. Patel, Karen P. Craig, Morgan Brady, Robert W. McGarrah, Connie Chen, William E. Kraus
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Risk of cardiovascular events and incident atrial fibrillation in patients without prior atrial fibrillation: Implications for expanding the indications for anticoagulation
  • Xiaoxi Yao, Bernard J. Gersh, Lindsey R. Sangaralingham, Nilay D. Shah, Peter A. Noseworthy

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.