Tracheotomy in the intensive care unit: Guidelines from a French expert panel: The French Intensive Care Society and the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine - 04/05/18
For the French Intensive Care Society
For the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
pages | 14 |
Iconographies | 4 |
Vidéos | 0 |
Autres | 0 |
Abstract |
Tracheotomy is widely used in intensive care units, albeit with great disparities between medical teams in terms of frequency and modality. Indications and techniques are, however, associated with variable levels of evidence based on inhomogeneous or even contradictory literature. Our aim was to conduct a systematic analysis of the published data in order to provide guidelines. We present herein recommendations for the use of tracheotomy in adult critically ill patients developed using the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) method. These guidelines were conducted by a group of experts from the French Intensive Care Society (Société de réanimation de langue française) and the French Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (Société francaise d’anesthésie réanimation) with the participation of the French Emergency Medicine Association (Société française de médecine d’urgence), the French Society of Otorhinolaryngology. Sixteen experts and two coordinators agreed to consider questions concerning tracheotomy and its practical implementation. Five topics were defined: indications and contraindications for tracheotomy in intensive care, tracheotomy techniques in intensive care, modalities of tracheotomy in intensive care, management of patients undergoing tracheotomy in intensive care, and decannulation in intensive care. The summary made by the experts and the application of GRADE methodology led to the drawing up of 8 formal guidelines, 10 recommendations, and 3 treatment protocols. Among the 8 formal guidelines, 2 have a high level of proof (Grade 1±) and 6 a low level of proof (Grade 2±). For the 10 recommendations, GRADE methodology was not applicable and instead 10 expert opinions were produced.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Abbreviations : ALS, GRADE, PICO, SFAR, SFMU, SFORL, SRLF
Plan
☆ | This article is being published jointly in Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine and Annals of Intensive Care. The manuscript validated by the board of the SRLF (12/13/2016) and the SFAR (12/15/2016). For the Société de réanimation de langue française (SRLF) and the Société française d’anesthésie et de réanmation (SFAR) in collaboration with the Société française de médecine d’urgence (SFMU) and the Société française d’oto-rhino-laryngologie (SFORL). |
☆☆ | For the Société de réanimation de langue française (SRLF) and the Société française d’anesthésie et de réanmation (SFAR) in collaboration with the Société française de médecine d’urgence (SFMU) and the Société française d’oto-rhino-laryngologie (SFORL). |
Vol 37 - N° 3
P. 281-294 - juin 2018 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’achat d’article à l’unité est indisponible à l’heure actuelle.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?