Chronic inducible urticaria: A systematic review of treatment options - 04/05/18
Abstract |
Background |
Chronic inducible urticaria (CindU) is a condition characterized by the appearance of recurrent wheals, angioedema, or both as a response to specific and reproducible triggers.
Objective |
We sought to systematically assess evidence on the efficacy and safety of treatment options for CindU. Results were used to inform the 2017 update of “The EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis and management of urticaria.”
Methods |
Randomized controlled trials and controlled intervention studies were searched systematically in various databases. Included studies were evaluated with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Where possible, results from single studies were meta-analyzed, applying the Mantel-Haenszel approach by using a random-effects model (Der Simonian–Laird).
Results |
We identified 30 studies that included patients with cold urticaria, symptomatic dermographism, delayed-pressure urticaria, or cholinergic urticaria. No studies on other forms of CindU were eligible. Risk of bias was often rated as unclear or high. Overall, second-generation antihistamines were more effective than placebo, and available data indicate that updosing might be effective. Omalizumab proved effective in patients with symptomatic dermographism, who did not respond to antihistamines. Detailed results are given for each type of CindU.
Conclusions |
The available evidence is limited by small samples, heterogeneous efficacy outcomes, and poor reporting quality in many of the included studies. The findings are congruent with the suggested stepwise approach to treating CindUs. However, the data do not allow for drawing specific conclusions for specific subtypes of CindU.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : Urticaria, angioedema, inducible urticaria, omalizumab, antihistamines, review
Abbreviations used : AE, CindU, CSU, H1-AH, ITT, MD, RR
Plan
Supported by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Dermatology Section, Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA2LEN), European Dermatology Forum (EDF), and World Allergy Organization (WAO) as part of the work Urticaria Guideline 2017–update and revision. |
|
Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: L. Eisert received travel support from Pfizer and received other compensation from LEO Pharma. T. Zuberbier has received grants from the EAACI Dermatology Section, GA2LEN, EDF, WAO, Novartis, and Henkel; has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, AbbVie, ALK-Abelló, Almirall, Astellas, Bayer Health Care, Bencard, Berlin Chemie, FAES, HAL, Leti, Meda, Menarini, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Stallergenes, Takeda, Teva, UCB, Kryolan, and L'Oreal; and has the following organizational affiliations: committee member of the World Health Organization (WHO) Initiative Allergic Rhinitis and Its Impact on Asthma (ARIA), member of the Board for the German Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), head of the European Centre for Allergy Research Foundation (ECARF), Secretary General of the GA2LEN, and member of the Committee on Allergy Diagnosis and Molecular Allergology, World Allergy Organization (WAO). M. Maurer has received grants from the EAACI Dermatology Section, GA2LEN, EDF, and WAO; has board memberships with Allakos, Aralez, FAES, Genentech, Novartis, Menarini, URIACH, and Moxie; has consultant arrangements with Allakos, Aralez, FAES, Genentech, Novartis, Menarini, URIACH, and Moxie; and has received grants from Allakos, Aralez, FAES, Genentech, Novartis, Menarini, URIACH, and Moxie. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest. |
Vol 141 - N° 5
P. 1726-1734 - mai 2018 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?