The impact of the repeal of Michigan's universal helmet law on traumatic brain injury: A statewide analysis - 24/04/18
Abstract |
Background |
In April of 2012, Michigan repealed its 35-year-old universal motorcycle helmet law in favor of a partial helmet law, which permits motorcyclists older than 21 years old with sufficient insurance and experience to drive un-helmeted. We evaluated the clinical impact of the repeal.
Methods |
The Michigan Trauma Quality Improvement Program's trauma database was queried for motorcycle crash patients between 1/1/09–4/12/12 and between 4/13/12–12/31/14.
Results |
There were 1970 patients in the pre-repeal analysis and 2673 patients in the post-repeal analysis. Following the repeal, patients were more likely to be un-helmeted (p < 0.001) and to have a traumatic brain injury (p < 0.001). Patients were also more likely to require neurosurgical interventions (relative risk 1.4, p = 0.011).
Conclusion |
Following the repeal of the universal helmet law, there has been a significant increase in traumatic brain injuries and neurosurgical interventions. This analysis highlights another detrimental impact of the repeal of the universal helmet law.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Highlights |
• | Michigan replaced a universal motorcycle helmet law with a partial helmet law. |
• | Under the partial helmet law. |
• | Patients were more likely to be un-helmeted. |
• | Patients were more likely to have a traumatic brain injury. |
• | Patients were more likely to require a neurosurgical procedure. |
Keywords : Helmet, Helmet law, Mortality, Motorcycle, Traumatic brain injury
Plan
Vol 215 - N° 3
P. 424-427 - mars 2018 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?