S'abonner

Aspirin for the prevention of preterm and term preeclampsia: systematic review and metaanalysis - 01/03/18

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.561 
Stephanie Roberge, PhD a, , Emmanuel Bujold, MD, MSc b, Kypros H. Nicolaides, MD a
a Harris Birthright Research Centre of Fetal Medicine, Fetal Medicine Research Institute, King’s College Hospital, London, United Kingdom 
b Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology & Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medecine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada 

Corresponding author: Stephanie Roberge, PhD.

Abstract

Objective Data

Metaanalyses of randomized controlled trials have reported contradictory results about the effect of aspirin in the prevention of preeclampsia, both in terms of the gestational age at the onset of treatment and the dose of the drug. The controversy may be resolved by a metaanalysis that includes several recently published trials and particularly the large Combined Multimarker Screening and Randomized Patient Treatment with Aspirin for Evidence-based Preeclampsia Prevention trial and by examination of whether there is a difference of the effect of aspirin on preterm vs term preeclampsia.

Study

We performed a systematic review and metaanalysis that evaluated the prophylactic effect of aspirin during pregnancy.

Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods

We completed a literature search through PubMed, Cinhal, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library from 1985 to June 2017. Relative risks with random effect were calculated with their 95% confidence intervals.

Results

Sixteen trials that included 18,907 participants provided data for preterm and term preeclampsia. Eight of the included studies were evaluated as being of good quality, and the other 8 studies were deemed to be of poor or uncertain quality. There was high heterogeneity within studies (I2 >50%) for preterm and term preeclampsia, but no heterogeneity was found in the subgroup of preterm preeclampsia when the onset of treatment was ≤16 weeks of gestation and the daily dose of aspirin was ≥100 mg (I2=0%). Administration of aspirin was associated with reduction in the risk of preterm preeclampsia (relative risk, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.45–0.87), but there was no significant effect on term preeclampsia (relative risk, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.70–1.21). The reduction in preterm preeclampsia was confined to the subgroup in which aspirin was initiated at ≤16 weeks of gestation and at a daily dose of ≥100 mg (relative risk, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.19–0.57). This effect was also observed in the high-quality studies. The reduction in preterm preeclampsia that was observed in the largest trial (Combined Multimarker Screening and Randomized Patient Treatment with Aspirin for Evidence-based Preeclampsia Prevention; n=1620; relative risk, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.20–0.72) was similar to that in the 5 smaller trials in which aspirin was initiated at ≤16 weeks of gestation and at a daily dose of ≥100 mg (n=639; relative risk, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.07–0.66).

Conclusion

Aspirin reduces the risk of preterm preeclampsia, but not term preeclampsia, and only when it is initiated at ≤16 weeks of gestation and at a daily dose of ≥100 mg.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : aspirin, metaanalysis, preeclampsia


Plan


 Supported by the Canadian Institute of Health Research (S.R.) and the Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Santé (E.B.).
 The authors report no conflict of interest.


© 2017  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 218 - N° 3

P. 287 - mars 2018 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Patient navigation across the spectrum of women’s health care in the United States
  • Kathryn M. McKenney, Noelle G. Martinez, Lynn M. Yee
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Spontaneous preterm birth: advances toward the discovery of genetic predisposition
  • Jerome F. Strauss, Roberto Romero, Nardhy Gomez-Lopez, Hannah Haymond-Thornburg, Bhavi P. Modi, Maria E. Teves, Laurel N. Pearson, Timothy P. York, Harvey A. Schenkein

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.