01: Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: Comparing anatomic outcomes at 1 year - 28/02/18
Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.185
N. Noor 1, 2, 3, D. Bastawros 4, C.U. Eto 5, S. Iyer 6, 10, M.E. Florian-Rodriguez 8, E. Lavelle 9, S. Lozo 10, M. Haviland 2, E.C. Von Bargen 11, D. Antosh 7
1 Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, MA
2 OB/GYN, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
3 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
4 Carolina Medical Center, Charlotte, NC
5 Emory University, Atlanta, GA
6 University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
7 Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
8 University of Texas South Western, Dallas, TX
9 University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
10 Northshore University Health System, Chicago, IL
11 Massachusetts General Hospital, Cambridge, MA
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.
Plan
| DISCLOSURE OF RELEVANT FINANCIAL RELATIONSHIPS: Nabila Noor: Nothing to disclose; Dina Bastawros: Nothing to disclose; Chidimma U. Eto: Nothing to disclose; Shilpa Iyer: Nothing to disclose; Maria E. Florian-Rodriguez: Nothing to disclose; Erin Lavelle: Nothing to disclose; Svjetlana Lozo: Nothing to disclose; Miriam Haviland: Nothing to disclose; Emily C. Von Bargen: Nothing to disclose; Danielle Antosh: Nothing to disclose. |
© 2018
Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS.
Vol 218 - N° 2S2
P. S881 - février 2018 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Letter from the SGS President
- 02: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) implementation in an urogynecology population
- C.M. Carter-Brooks, A.L. Du, A. Romanova, H. Zyczynski
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?