S'abonner

Ceftazidime-avibactam versus meropenem in nosocomial pneumonia, including ventilator-associated pneumonia (REPROVE): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 non-inferiority trial - 23/02/18

Doi : 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30747-8 
Antoni Torres, ProfMD a, b, c, , Nanshan Zhong, ProfMD d, Jan Pachl, ProfMD e, Jean-François Timsit, ProfMD f, Marin Kollef, ProfMD g, Zhangjing Chen, MD h, Jie Song, MD h, Dianna Taylor, BSc i, Peter J Laud, MSc j, Gregory G Stone, PhD k, Joseph W Chow, MD l
a Servei de Pneumologia, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain 
b Institut D’investigació August Pi I Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain 
c Ciber de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Spain 
d State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China 
e Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic 
f APHP Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris-Diderot University, Paris, France 
g Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA 
h AstraZeneca, Shanghai, China 
i Taylormade Health, Warrington, United Kingdom 
j Statistical Services Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK 
k Pfizer, Groton, CT, USA 
l Pfizer, Collegeville, PA, USA 

* Correspondence to: Prof Antoni Torres, Servei de Pneumologia, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain Correspondence to: Prof Antoni Torres, Servei de Pneumologia Hospital Clinic Barcelona University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain

Summary

Background

Nosocomial pneumonia is commonly associated with antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam in patients with nosocomial pneumonia, including ventilator-associated pneumonia, compared with meropenem in a multinational, phase 3, double-blind, non-inferiority trial (REPROVE).

Methods

Adults with nosocomial pneumonia (including ventilator-associated pneumonia), enrolled at 136 centres in 23 countries, were randomly assigned (1:1) to 2000 mg ceftazidime and 500 mg avibactam (by 2 h intravenous infusion every 8 h) or 1000 mg meropenem (by 30-min intravenous infusion every 8 h) for 7–14 days; regimens were adjusted for renal function. Computer-generated randomisation codes were stratified by infection type and geographical region with a block size of four. Participants and investigators were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was clinical cure at the test-of-cure visit (21–25 days after randomisation). Non-inferiority was concluded if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference was greater than −12·5% in the coprimary clinically modified intention-to-treat and clinically evaluable populations. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01808092) and EudraCT (2012-004006-96).

Findings

Between April 13, 2013, and Dec 11, 2015, 879 patients were randomly assigned. 808 patients were included in the safety population, 726 were included in the clinically modified intention-to-treat population, and 527 were included in the clinically evaluable population. Predominant Gram-negative baseline pathogens in the microbiologically modified intention-to-treat population (n=355) were Klebsiella pneumoniae (37%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (30%); 28% were ceftazidime-non-susceptible. In the clinically modified intention-to-treat population, 245 (68·8%) of 356 patients in the ceftazidime-avibactam group were clinically cured, compared with 270 (73·0%) of 370 patients in the meropenem group (difference −4·2% [95% CI −10·8 to 2·5]). In the clinically evaluable population, 199 (77·4%) of 257 participants were clinically cured in the ceftazidime-avibactam group, compared with 211 (78·1%) of 270 in the meropenem group (difference −0·7% [95% CI −7·9 to 6·4]). Adverse events occurred in 302 (75%) of 405 patients in the ceftazidime-avibactam group versus 299 (74%) of 403 in the meropenem group (safety population), and were mostly mild or moderate in intensity and unrelated to study treatment. Serious adverse events occurred in 75 (19%) patients in the ceftazidime-avibactam group and 54 (13%) patients in the meropenem group. Four serious adverse events (all in the ceftazidime-avibactam group) were judged to be treatment related.

Interpretation

Ceftazidime-avibactam was non-inferior to meropenem in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia. These results support a role for ceftazidime-avibactam as a potential alternative to carbapenems in patients with nosocomial pneumonia (including ventilator-associated pneumonia) caused by Gram-negative pathogens.

Funding

AstraZeneca.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2018  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 18 - N° 3

P. 285-295 - mars 2018 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • The global burden of tuberculosis: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015
  • GBD Tuberculosis Collaborators, Hmwe H Kyu, Emilie R Maddison, Nathaniel J Henry, John Everett Mumford, Ryan Barber, Chloe Shields, Jonathan C Brown, Grant Nguyen, Austin Carter, Timothy M Wolock, Haidong Wang, Patrick Y Liu, Marissa Reitsma, Jennifer M Ross, Amanuel Alemu Abajobir, Kalkidan Hassen Abate, Kaja Abbas, Mubarek Abera, Semaw Ferede Abera, Habtamu Abera Hareri, Muktar Ahmed, Kefyalew Addis Alene, Nelson Alvis-Guzman, Joshua Amo-Adjei, Jason Andrews, Hossein Ansari, Carl Abelardo Antonio, Palwasha Anwari, Hamid Asayesh, Tesfay Mehari Atey, Sachin Atre, Aleksandra Barac, Justin Beardsley, Neeraj Bedi, Isabela Bensenor, Addisu Shunu Beyene, Zahid Ahmad Butt, Pere-Joan Cardona, Devasahayam Christopher, Lalit Dandona, Rakhi Dandona, Kebede Deribe, Amare Deribew, Rebecca Ehrenkranz, Maysaa El Sayed Zaki, Aman Endries, Tesfaye R Feyissa, Florian Fischer, Ruoyan Gai, Alberto L Garcia-Basteiro, Tsegaye Tewelde Gebrehiwot, Hailay Gesesew, Belete Getahun, Philimon Gona, Amador Goodridge, Harish Gugnani, Hassan Haghparast-Bidgoli, Gessessew Bugssa Hailu, Hamid Yimam Hassen, Esayas Hilawe, Nobuyuki Horita, Kathryn H Jacobsen, Jost B Jonas, Amir Kasaeian, Muktar Sano Kedir, Laura Kemmer, Yousef Khader, Ejaz Khan, Young-Ho Khang, Abdullah T Khoja, Yun Jin Kim, Parvaiz Koul, Ai Koyanagi, Kristopher J Krohn, G Anil Kumar, Michael Kutz, Rakesh Lodha, Hassan Magdy And El Razek, Reza Majdzadeh, Tsegahun Manyazewal, Ziad Memish, Walter Mendoza, Haftay Berhane Mezgebe, Shafiu Mohammed, Felix Akpojene Ogbo, In-Hwan Oh, Eyal Oren, Aaron Osgood-Zimmerman, David Pereira, Dietrich Plass, Farshad Pourmalek, Mostafa Qorbani, Anwar Rafay, Mahfuzar Rahman, Rajesh Kumar Rai, Puja C Rao, Sarah E Ray, Robert Reiner, Nickolas Reinig, Saeid Safiri, Joshua A Salomon, Logan Sandar, Benn Sartorius, Morteza Shamsizadeh, Muki Shey, Desalegn Markos Shifti, Hirbo Shore, Jasvinder Singh, Chandrashekhar T Sreeramareddy, Soumya Swaminathan, Scott J Swartz, Fentaw Tadese, Bemnet Amare Tedla, Balewgizie Sileshi Tegegne, Belay Tessema, Roman Topor-Madry, Kingsley Nnanna Ukwaja, Olalekan A. Uthman, Vasiliy Vlassov, Stein Emil Vollset, Tolassa Wakayo, Solomon Weldegebreal, Ronny Westerman, Abdulhalik Workicho, Naohiro Yonemoto, Seok-Jun Yoon, Marcel Yotebieng, Mohsen Naghavi, Simon I Hay, Theo Vos, Christopher JL Murray
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection in patients 60 years and older (EXTEND): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3b/4 trial
  • Benoit Guery, Francesco Menichetti, Veli-Jukka Anttila, Nicholas Adomakoh, Jose Maria Aguado, Karen Bisnauthsing, Areti Georgopali, Simon D Goldenberg, Andreas Karas, Gbenga Kazeem, Chris Longshaw, Jose Alejandro Palacios-Fabrega, Oliver A Cornely, Maria J G T Vehreschild, EXTEND Clinical Study Group

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.