S'abonner

Sulfonylureas as Initial Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes and the Risk of Severe Hypoglycemia - 25/11/17

Doi : 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.09.044 
Oriana Yu, MD, MSc a, b, Laurent Azoulay, PhD a, c, d, Hui Yin, MSc a, Kristian B. Filion, PhD a, c, e, Samy Suissa, PhD a, c, e, *
a Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada 
b Division of Endocrinology, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada 
c Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada 
d Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada 
e Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada 

*Requests for reprints should be addressed to: Samy Suissa, PhD, Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Cote Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, Québec H3T 1E2, Canada.Centre for Clinical EpidemiologyJewish General Hospital3755 Cote Sainte-CatherineMontrealQuébecH3T 1E2Canada
Sous presse. Épreuves corrigées par l'auteur. Disponible en ligne depuis le Saturday 25 November 2017

Highlights

Risk of severe hypoglycemia, requiring hospitalization, associated with sulfonylurea use was assessed.
Severe hypoglycemia risk was 4.5 times higher among patients initiating sulfonylurea compared with patients initiating metformin.
An alternative antidiabetic agent to sulfonylurea may be warranted when metformin is contraindicated.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Abstract

Purpose

The magnitude of the risk of severe hypoglycemia associated with sulfonylureas as the initial treatment for type 2 diabetes in the real-world setting is unknown. We assessed the risk of severe hypoglycemia associated with initiating monotherapy with sulfonylurea compared with metformin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Methods

By using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episode Statistics linked to the Office for National Statistics, we identified a cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes who initiated sulfonylureas or metformin monotherapy between April 1, 1998, and December 31, 2012, with follow-up until December 31, 2013. Sulfonylurea users were matched one-to-one to metformin users by high-dimensional propensity scores. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of severe hypoglycemia, defined as requiring hospitalization, were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models comparing sulfonylureas with metformin monotherapy.

Results

The study cohort consisted of 14,012 initiators of sulfonylureas matched to 14,012 initiators of metformin. The mean treated follow-up time was 1.41 (standard deviation, 1.84) years. Use of sulfonylurea was associated with an elevated incidence of severe hypoglycemia compared with metformin as the initiating monotherapy for type 2 diabetes (incidence rate, 2.4/1000 person-years; 95% CI, 1.90-2.90; HR, 4.53; 95% CI, 2.76-7.45).

Conclusions

Sulfonylureas, when prescribed as the initiating monotherapy for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, is associated with a 4.5-fold increase in the risk of severe hypoglycemia. Given the negative consequences of this outcome, clinicians should consider alternative hypoglycemic agents when metformin is not tolerated or contraindicated.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Diabetes, Hypoglycemia, Sulfonylurea


Plan


 Funding: This study was funded in part by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR MOP-49462), Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI 94480), and Boehringer Ingelheim. The sponsors had no role in the design of the study, the analysis and interpretation of the data, or the preparation and approval of the manuscript. Boehringer Ingelheim was invited to comment on the study protocol and the manuscript.
 Conflicts of Interest: SS has received research grants and participated in advisory board meetings or as a speaker at conferences for AstraZeneca, Bayer Pharma, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Merck, and Novartis.
 Authorship: All authors had access to the data and played a role in writing this manuscript.


© 2017  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.