S'abonner

A randomized comparison of three chest compression techniques and associated hemodynamic effect during infant CPR: A randomized manikin study - 28/09/17

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.04.024 
Jacek Smereka, MD, PhD a, Lukasz Szarpak, EMT-P, DPH, PhD b, , Antonio Rodríguez-Núñez, MD, PhD c : Prof., Jerzy R. Ladny, MD, PhD d : Prof., Steve Leung, MD e, Kurt Ruetzler, MD, PhD e, f : Prof.
a Department of Emergency Medical Service, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland 
b Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland 
c Paediatric Emergency and Critical Care Division, Clinical University Hospital, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Institute of Research of Santiago [IDIS] and SAMID Network, Spain 
d Department of Emergency Medicine and Disaster, Medical University Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland 
e Department of Outcomes Research, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA 
f Department of General Anesthesiology, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA 

Corresponding author at: Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, 4 Lindleya Str., 02-005 Warsaw, Poland.Department of Emergency MedicineMedical University of Warsaw4 Lindleya Str.Warsaw02-005Poland

Abstract

Introduction

Pediatric cardiac arrest is an uncommon but critical life-threatening event requiring effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation. High-quality cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is essential, but is poorly performed, even by highly skilled healthcare providers. The recently described two-thumb chest compression technique (nTTT) consists of the two thumbs directed at the angle of 90° to the chest while having the fingers fist-clenched. This technique might facilitate adequate chest-compression depth, chest-compression rate and rate of full chest-pressure relief.

Methods

42 paramedics from the national Emergency Medical Service of Poland performed three single-rescuer CPR sessions for 10 minutes each. Each session was randomly assigned to the conventional two-thumb (TTHT), the conventional two-finger (TFT) or the nTTT. The manikin used for this study was connected with an arterial blood pressure measurement device and blood measurements were documented on a 10-seconds cycle.

Results

The nTTT provided significant higher systolic (82 vs. 30 vs. 41 mmHg). A statistically significant difference was noticed between nTTT and TFT (p<.001), nTTT and TTHT (p<0.001), TFT and TTHT (p=0.003). The median diastolic preassure using nTTT was 16 mmHg compared with 9 mmHg for TFT (p<0.001), and 9.5 mmHg for TTHT (p<0.001). Mean arterial pressure using distinct methods varied and amounted to 40 vs. 22. vs. 26 mmHg (nTTT vs. TFT vs. TTHT, respectively). A statistically significant difference was noticed between nTTT and TFT (p<0.001), nTTT and TTEHT (p<0.001), and TFT and TTHT (p<0.001). The highest median pulse pressure was obtained by the nTTT 67.5 mmHg. Pulse pressure was 31.5 mmHg in the TTHT and 24 mmHg in the TFT. The difference between TFT and TTHT (p=0.025), TFT and nTTT (p<0.001), as well as between TTHT and nTTT (p<0.001) were statistically significant.

Conclusions

The new nTTT technique generated higher arterial blood pressures compared to established chest compression techniques using an infant manikin model, suggesting a more effective chest compression. Our results have important clinical implications as nTTT was simple to perform and could be widely taught to both healthcare professionals and bystanders. Whether this technique translates to improved outcomes over existing techniques needs further animal studies and subsequent human trials.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Infant CPR, Chest compression, Hemodynamics


Plan


© 2017  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 35 - N° 10

P. 1420-1425 - octobre 2017 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Emergency department visits involving benzodiazepines and non-benzodiazepine receptor agonists
  • Christopher N. Kaufmann, Adam P. Spira, G. Caleb Alexander, Lainie Rutkow, Ramin Mojtabai
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Differences in test ordering between nurse practitioners and attending emergency physicians when acting as Provider in Triage
  • Tomer Begaz, David Elashoff, Tristan R. Grogan, David Talan, Breena R. Taira

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.