S'abonner

Peanut Allergen Threshold Study (PATS): Novel single-dose oral food challenge study to validate eliciting doses in children with peanut allergy - 27/09/17

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.01.030 
Jonathan O'B. Hourihane, MD, DM a, , Katrina J. Allen, MD, PhD b, c, Wayne G. Shreffler, MD, PhD d, Gillian Dunngalvin, PhD a, e, Julie A. Nordlee, MS f, Giovanni A. Zurzolo, PhD b, g, Audrey Dunngalvin, PhD a, e, Lyle C. Gurrin, PhD h, Joseph L. Baumert, PhD f, Steve L. Taylor, PhD f
a Paediatrics and Child Health, University College, Cork, Ireland 
e School of Applied Psychology, University College, Cork, Ireland 
b Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia 
c Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia 
d Food Allergy Centre and Centre for Immunology and Inflammatory Disease, and Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass 
f Food Allergy Research and Resource Program, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Neb 
g Centre for Chronic Disease, College of Health and Biomedicine, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia 
h Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia 

Corresponding author: Jonathan O'B. Hourihane, MD, DM, Paediatrics and Child Health, University College Cork, Ireland.Paediatrics and Child HealthUniversity College CorkIreland

Abstract

Background

Eliciting doses (EDs) of allergenic foods can be defined by the distribution of threshold doses for subjects within a specific population. The ED05 is the dose that elicits a reaction in 5% of allergic subjects. The predicted ED05 for peanut is 1.5 mg of peanut protein (6 mg of whole peanut).

Objective

We sought to validate the predicted peanut ED05 (1.5 mg) with a novel single-dose challenge.

Methods

Consecutive eligible children with peanut allergy in 3 centers were prospectively invited to participate, irrespective of previous reaction severity. Predetermined criteria for objective reactions were used to identify ED05 single-dose reactors.

Results

Five hundred eighteen children (mean age, 6.8 years) were eligible. No significant demographic or clinical differences were identified between 381 (74%) participants and 137 (26%) nonparticipants or between subjects recruited at each center. Three hundred seventy-eight children (206 male) completed the study. Almost half the group reported ignoring precautionary allergen labeling. Two hundred forty-five (65%) children experienced no reaction to the single dose of peanut. Sixty-seven (18%) children reported a subjective reaction without objective findings. Fifty-eight (15%) children experienced signs of a mild and transient nature that did not meet the predetermined criteria. Only 8 (2.1%; 95% CI, 0.6%-3.4%) subjects met the predetermined criteria for an objective and likely related event. No child experienced more than a mild reaction, 4 of the 8 received oral antihistamines only, and none received epinephrine. Food allergy–related quality of life improved from baseline to 1 month after challenge regardless of outcome (η2 = 0.2, P < .0001). Peanut skin prick test responses and peanut- and Ara h 2–specific IgE levels were not associated with objective reactivity to peanut ED05.

Conclusion

A single administration of 1.5 mg of peanut protein elicited objective reactions in fewer than the predicted 5% of patients with peanut allergy. The novel single-dose oral food challenge appears clinically safe and patient acceptable, regardless of the outcome. It identifies the most highly dose-sensitive population with food allergy not otherwise identifiable by using routinely available peanut skin prick test responses or specific IgE levels, but this single-dose approach has not yet been validated for risk assessment of individual patients.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : Eliciting dose, food allergy related quality of life questionnaire, single dose, peanut thresholds, oral food challenges, Voluntary Incidental Trace Allergen Labelling, Peanut Allergen Threshold Study

Abbreviations used : DBPCFC, ED, ED01, ED05, FAQL, FAQL-CF, FAQL-PF, OFC, PAL, PATS, sIgE, SPT


Plan


 This project is funded by the Food Allergy Research & Resource Program (FARRP) and supported by grant no. 1UL1TR001102-01.
 Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: J. O'B. Hourihane receives grant support from the Food Safety Authority and the National Children's Institute, Ireland; serves on the board for Aimmune Corporation; serves as a consultant for Aimmune Corporation; and receives payments for lectures from Thermo Fisher, Nutricia, and Servier. W. G. Shreffler receives grant support from the Food Allergy Research & Resource Program (FARRP); serves on the board for FARE; serves as a consultant for Sanofi; and receives grant support from Mead Johnson, Sanofi, Gerber Foundation, Aimmune, DBV, and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). G. Dunngalvin receives grant support from the Food Safety Authority and the National Children's Institute. A. Dunngalvin receives grant support from the Food Safety Authority and the National Children's Institute, serves as a consultant for Aimmune Corporation, and receives payments for lectures from Nutricia and SafeFood Ireland. J. L. Baumert receives grant support from FARRP, serves as a consultant for DBV Technologies, and receives royalties from Neogen Corporation. S. L. Taylor receives grant support from FARRP and receives royalties from Neogen Corporation. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest.


© 2017  American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 139 - N° 5

P. 1583-1590 - mai 2017 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • A clinical trial of intradermal and intramuscular seasonal influenza vaccination in patients with atopic dermatitis
  • Donald Y.M. Leung, Brett Jepson, Lisa A. Beck, Jon M. Hanifin, Lynda C. Schneider, Amy S. Paller, Katherine Monti, Gloria David, Jennifer Canniff, Margarita Gomez Lorenzo, Adriana Weinberg
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Randomized placebo-controlled trial of hen's egg consumption for primary prevention in infants
  • Johanna Bellach, Veronika Schwarz, Birgit Ahrens, Valérie Trendelenburg, Özlem Aksünger, Birgit Kalb, Bodo Niggemann, Thomas Keil, Kirsten Beyer

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.