S'abonner

Classical Conditioning Differences Associated With Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review - 01/08/17

Doi : 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.02.430 
Daniel S. Harvie , , G. Lorimer Moseley , , Susan L. Hillier , Ann Meulders §,
 Body in Mind Research Group, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia 
 Recover Injury Research Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia 
 Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia 
§ Research Group on Health Psychology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium 
 Center for Excellence on Generalization Research in Health and Psychopathology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium 

Address reprint requests to Daniel S. Harvie, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, QLD 4222, Australia.Griffith UniversityGold Coast CampusSouthportQLD4222Australia

Abstract

Prominent clinical models of chronic pain propose a fundamental role of classical conditioning in the development of pain-related disability. If classical conditioning is key to this process, then people with chronic pain may show a different response to pain-related conditioned stimuli than healthy control subjects. We set out to determine whether this is the case by undertaking a comprehensive and systematic review of the literature. To identify studies comparing classical conditioning between people with chronic pain and healthy control subjects, the databases MEDLINE, PsychINFO, PsychARTICLES, Scopus, and CINAHL were searched using key words and medical subject headings consistent with ‘classical conditioning’ and ‘pain.’ Articles were included when: 1) pain-free control and chronic pain groups were included, and 2) a differential classical conditioning design was used. The systematic search revealed 7 studies investigating differences in classical conditioning between people with chronic pain and healthy control participants. The included studies involved a total of 129 people with chronic pain (fibromyalgia syndrome, spinal pain, hand pain, irritable bowel syndrome), and 104 healthy control participants. Outcomes included indices of pain-related conditioning such as unconditioned stimulus (US) expectancy and contingency awareness, self-report and physiological measures of pain-related fear, evaluative judgements of conditioned stimulus pleasantness, and muscular and cortical responses. Because of variability in outcomes, meta-analyses included a maximum of 4 studies. People with chronic pain tended to show reduced differential learning and flatter generalization gradients with respect to US expectancy and fear-potentiated eyeblink startle responses. Some studies showed a propensity for greater muscular responses and perceptions of unpleasantness in response to pain-associated cues, relative to control cues.

Perspective

The review revealed preliminary evidence that people with chronic pain may exhibit less differential US expectancy and fear learning. This characteristic may contribute to widespread fear-avoidance behavior. The assumption that altered classical conditioning may be a predisposing or maintaining factor for chronic pain remains to be verified.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

Classical conditioning processes may contribute to chronic pain-related disability.
Seven studies investigated if chronic pain relates to altered classical conditioning.
Chronic pain patients tend to show less selective pain expectancy and fear learning.
Classical conditioning deficits may predispose or maintain chronic pain disability.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : Classical conditioning, learning deficits, chronic pain, associative learning


Plan


 A.M. is a postdoctoral researcher of the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen), Belgium, (grant ID: 12E3714N). G.L.M. is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Senior Research Fellowship. This work is supported by National Health and Medical Research Council project grant ID 1047137.
 The authors acknowledge that 3 of the included articles were led by coauthor A.M. and that this presents a potential conflict. A.M. was not involved in the search/inclusion process, and was not involved in assessing risk of bias of her own work. The authors have no further conflicts of interest to declare.
 Supplementary data accompanying this article are available online at www.jpain.org and www.sciencedirect.com.


© 2017  American Pain Society. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 18 - N° 8

P. 889-898 - août 2017 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • What's in a Name? The Case of Emotional Disclosure of Pain-Related Distress
  • Annmarie Cano, Liesbet Goubert
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • An Improved Rodent Model of Trigeminal Neuropathic Pain by Unilateral Chronic Constriction Injury of Distal Infraorbital Nerve
  • Weihua Ding, Zerong You, Shiqian Shen, Jinsheng Yang, Grewo Lim, Jason T. Doheny, Lucy Chen, Shengmei Zhu, Jianren Mao

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.