Classical Conditioning Differences Associated With Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review - 01/08/17
, G. Lorimer Moseley ∗, ‡, Susan L. Hillier ∗, Ann Meulders §, ¶Abstract |
Prominent clinical models of chronic pain propose a fundamental role of classical conditioning in the development of pain-related disability. If classical conditioning is key to this process, then people with chronic pain may show a different response to pain-related conditioned stimuli than healthy control subjects. We set out to determine whether this is the case by undertaking a comprehensive and systematic review of the literature. To identify studies comparing classical conditioning between people with chronic pain and healthy control subjects, the databases MEDLINE, PsychINFO, PsychARTICLES, Scopus, and CINAHL were searched using key words and medical subject headings consistent with ‘classical conditioning’ and ‘pain.’ Articles were included when: 1) pain-free control and chronic pain groups were included, and 2) a differential classical conditioning design was used. The systematic search revealed 7 studies investigating differences in classical conditioning between people with chronic pain and healthy control participants. The included studies involved a total of 129 people with chronic pain (fibromyalgia syndrome, spinal pain, hand pain, irritable bowel syndrome), and 104 healthy control participants. Outcomes included indices of pain-related conditioning such as unconditioned stimulus (US) expectancy and contingency awareness, self-report and physiological measures of pain-related fear, evaluative judgements of conditioned stimulus pleasantness, and muscular and cortical responses. Because of variability in outcomes, meta-analyses included a maximum of 4 studies. People with chronic pain tended to show reduced differential learning and flatter generalization gradients with respect to US expectancy and fear-potentiated eyeblink startle responses. Some studies showed a propensity for greater muscular responses and perceptions of unpleasantness in response to pain-associated cues, relative to control cues.
Perspective |
The review revealed preliminary evidence that people with chronic pain may exhibit less differential US expectancy and fear learning. This characteristic may contribute to widespread fear-avoidance behavior. The assumption that altered classical conditioning may be a predisposing or maintaining factor for chronic pain remains to be verified.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Highlights |
• | Classical conditioning processes may contribute to chronic pain-related disability. |
• | Seven studies investigated if chronic pain relates to altered classical conditioning. |
• | Chronic pain patients tend to show less selective pain expectancy and fear learning. |
• | Classical conditioning deficits may predispose or maintain chronic pain disability. |
Key words : Classical conditioning, learning deficits, chronic pain, associative learning
Plan
| A.M. is a postdoctoral researcher of the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen), Belgium, (grant ID: 12E3714N). G.L.M. is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Senior Research Fellowship. This work is supported by National Health and Medical Research Council project grant ID 1047137. |
|
| The authors acknowledge that 3 of the included articles were led by coauthor A.M. and that this presents a potential conflict. A.M. was not involved in the search/inclusion process, and was not involved in assessing risk of bias of her own work. The authors have no further conflicts of interest to declare. |
|
| Supplementary data accompanying this article are available online at www.jpain.org and www.sciencedirect.com. |
Vol 18 - N° 8
P. 889-898 - août 2017 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
